1994
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci1204_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Talking, Relating, and Achieving: Effects of Cooperative Learning and Whole-Class Instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
41
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, students in Tan et al's study also commented that group investigation required more of their time than did traditional whole-class instruction, so they had insufficient time to study for their other class tests and to revise for the forthcoming examinations. As a result, although most of the earlier studies on group investigation (Lazarowitz & Karsenty, 1990;Shachar & Sharan, 1994;Sharan & Hertz-Lazarowitz, 1980;Sharan & Shachar, 1988;Sharan & Shaulov, 1990;Sharan et al, 1985) yielded significant differences between the two methods of classroom instructions, Tan et al's group investigation study failed to work with Singaporean students. Lee, Ng and Phang (1999) reported that their study was not well conducted because of two main difficulties.…”
Section: Why Did CL Fail In the Asian Context? Some Views From The Rementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Besides, students in Tan et al's study also commented that group investigation required more of their time than did traditional whole-class instruction, so they had insufficient time to study for their other class tests and to revise for the forthcoming examinations. As a result, although most of the earlier studies on group investigation (Lazarowitz & Karsenty, 1990;Shachar & Sharan, 1994;Sharan & Hertz-Lazarowitz, 1980;Sharan & Shachar, 1988;Sharan & Shaulov, 1990;Sharan et al, 1985) yielded significant differences between the two methods of classroom instructions, Tan et al's group investigation study failed to work with Singaporean students. Lee, Ng and Phang (1999) reported that their study was not well conducted because of two main difficulties.…”
Section: Why Did CL Fail In the Asian Context? Some Views From The Rementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Interaction among group members is critically important to the success of small group activities with Shachar and Sharan (1994) arguing that this will only happen when teachers create conditions that enable students to work in small groups on tasks that require cooperation among group members. This includes ensuring that students are given a group task that is open and discovery-based where there is no right answer and successful completion requires students to interact with each other and share and exchange resources (information, knowledge, heuristic problem-solving strategies, materials and skills).…”
Section: Group Composition and Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hal tersebut semakin mempertajam bahwa strategi pembelajaran eksperiensial mampu meningkatkan belajar berdasar regulasi diri, dalam hal ini meningkatkan tanggung jawab dan performa akademik mahasiswa. Penelitian Huynh (2009), Slazak & Zurick (2009), Grouws & Cebulla (2001), Shachar & Sharan (1994) menunjukkan bahwa experiential learning memungkinkan seseorang lebih tertarik pada materi pembelajaran. Ketertarikan ini akan menjadi dorongan yang kuat untuk meningkatkan semangat belajar mahasiswa, sebagaimana dikatakan (Syah, 2010) bahwa rasa tertarik (minat) dapat mendorong seseorang untuk melakukan sesuatu.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified