“…Youths' level and quality of participation in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), whether in the broad STEM enterprise and/or in disciplinary domains, is largely dependent on their self-perception or identity (e.g., seeing oneself as a "physics person", Dou et al, 2019;Hazari et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2018). This self-perception is significantly influenced by social interactions in which an individual is (or is not) acknowledged as a STEM person by meaningful others (Archer et al, 2012;Carlone & Johnson, 2007;Gee, 2000;Jackson et al, 2019;Rodriguez et al, 2019;Vincent-Ruz & Schunn, 2018). One consequence of the power of these recognition events is the internalization of a dominant "Discourse" (Gee, 2000) of who is or can become a "STEM person" as reflected in verbal exchanges, educational materials, behavioral expectations (e.g., using scientific jargon), and working professionals visible in these spaces (Dawson et al, 2020).…”