“…High demand upon and limited resources of AMHS are suggested as among the leading organisational constraints, which forces a rigid intake criterion of only the most serious and severe cases (Cosgrave et al., ; Singh et al., ). A number of studies have also pointed out that rigid cut‐off boundaries, poorly designed transition protocols, and a lack of communication and collaboration between adult and child/adolescent services are all barriers to successful transition of clients (Davis & Sondheimer, ; Lindgren, Soderberg, & Skar, ; McLaren et al., ; McNamara et al., ; Richards & Vostanis, ; Singh, Evans, Sireling, & Stuart, ; Singh, Paul, Ford, Kramer, & Weaver, ). Even for those accepted into AMHS, disengagement can occur due to a combination of personal factors, such as resistance to leave an established clinical relationship, anxieties of working with a new case manager in a new area, and limited social support to cushion the transition to adulthood and AMHS (Hovish, Weaver, Islam, Paul, & Singh, ; Jivanjee, Kruzich, & Gordon, ; Soderberg, Skar, & Lindgren, ; Vanheusden et al., ; Yu, Adams, Burns, Brindis, & Irwin Jr., ).…”