2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taking control of microplastics data: A comparison of control and blank data correction methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the use of applicable blank controls, and the resulting application of them, is still a perplexing and emerging issue amongst researchers characterizing and quantifying MPs in biotic and abiotic samples. As Dawson et al [39] concluded in their evaluation of the use of blanks in recent MP studies, data analysis within current environmental studies is often nontransparent, particularly the analysis of controls and blanks, suggesting the MP research community establish method harmonization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the use of applicable blank controls, and the resulting application of them, is still a perplexing and emerging issue amongst researchers characterizing and quantifying MPs in biotic and abiotic samples. As Dawson et al [39] concluded in their evaluation of the use of blanks in recent MP studies, data analysis within current environmental studies is often nontransparent, particularly the analysis of controls and blanks, suggesting the MP research community establish method harmonization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on the calculations are provided in SI section 2.2 . The number and mass of MP suspect particles of each series were corrected by the respective procedural blanks [ 37 ]. Therefore, a limit of quantification (LOQ) was calculated based on the mean particle number of the respective procedural blanks plus ten times the standard deviation for each combination of size class, morphology, and fluorescence group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was due to the different porosity of filtration possible for the two different matrices. The μ-Raman results were used to quantify the number of MP particles and the quantity of different plastic polymer types in each sample according to Armbruster and Pry 34 and Dawson et al, 35 where LOQ ≥ LOD (Limit of Detection) and LOD = (mean blank + 1.645 (SD blank )) + 1.645 (SD lowest sample result ).…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%