Taking a chance on KK

Goodman, Jeremy; Salow, Bernhard

doi:10.1007/s11098-017-0861-1

Cited by 47 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… The view of knowledge that emerges bears some important similarities to the account developed in Goodman and Salow (). Their account is motivated on largely independent grounds.…”

mentioning

confidence: 67%

Modal Virtue Epistemology

Beddor

Pavese

2018

Philos Phenomenol Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the publication of Gettier (1963), many accounts of knowledge have been proposed, but few have withstood the test of time. Of the various proposals, two have emerged from the fray in relatively good shape, although not entirely unscathed. One of these is a modal account. While there are different ways of developing a modal account, the most common proposal in the contemporary literature explains knowledge in terms of safety. More precisely: Safety: S's belief amounts to knowledge if and only if it could not have easily been false i.e., if and only if in all relevantly close worlds where S forms a sufficiently similar belief, S's belief is true. 2,3

show abstract

“… The view of knowledge that emerges bears some important similarities to the account developed in Goodman and Salow (). Their account is motivated on largely independent grounds.…”

mentioning

confidence: 67%

Modal Virtue Epistemology

Beddor

Pavese

2018

Philos Phenomenol Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…15 See Goodman (2013), Greco (2014), Goodman and Salow (2018), Carter (2019), Beddor and Pavese (n.d.), Goldstein and Carter (2020).…”

Section: IVmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inexact knowledge 2.0

Dutant

Rosenkranz

2020

Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(Given the mild assumption that if it's rational to believe "If I don't know p then p" it's rational to believe "I know p" for the latter is equivalent to the material implication corresponding to the conditional, namely "I know p or p".) 18 See Jenkins (2006), Ball (2013), Greco (2014), Stalnaker (2015), Dutant (2016) and Goodman and Salow (2018) for accounts along those lines. Views of that kind are sometimes put forward to vindicate the KK principle (Greco, Stalnaker, Goodman and Salow).…”

Section: A Simple Fixmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since the views proposed here are compatible with Huemer's idea that justification supervenes upon an individual's non-factive mental states, we need not worry too much about whether his charge against standard reliabilism is warranted. 4 See alsoGoodman and Salow (2018). We focus on Smith's more detailed account.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%