2020
DOI: 10.1080/0020174x.2020.1754286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inexact knowledge 2.0

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our paper contributes to a growing family of papers that offer fairly precise models of perceptual knowledge, including Williamson 2013a, Weatherson 2013, Goodman 2013, Cohen and Comesaña 2013, Williamson 2014, Carter 2019, Dutant and Rosenkranz 2019, Carter and Goldstein 2021 For closely related models of statistical knowledge, see Dorr et al 2014 andGoodman andSalow 2018. Like these papers, our models have a number of simplifying assumptions, which we flag throughout.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our paper contributes to a growing family of papers that offer fairly precise models of perceptual knowledge, including Williamson 2013a, Weatherson 2013, Goodman 2013, Cohen and Comesaña 2013, Williamson 2014, Carter 2019, Dutant and Rosenkranz 2019, Carter and Goldstein 2021 For closely related models of statistical knowledge, see Dorr et al 2014 andGoodman andSalow 2018. Like these papers, our models have a number of simplifying assumptions, which we flag throughout.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…See[44,45,46,17,21,11,19,18,6,33,4,7,34,16] for related ideas about knowledge,[39,40,41,42,43] for related ideas about justified belief, and[27,35] and references therein for related ideas about non-monotonic reasoning.2 See[38,55,25] for precedents in the case of knowledge, and[29,56,24,5] for precedents in the case of belief.3 See[10,2,3,41,42,19,18] for recent discussion of the kind of cases in § §3-5, and[50,51,53,54,8,17,47,45,6,12,7,18] for recent discussion of the kind of cases in §6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%