“…The advertisement call of Physalaemus barrioi differs from species of the: i) P. deimaticus (Nascimento et al, 2001;Baêta et al, 2007a) and P. signifer groups (Cardoso and Haddad, 1985;Heyer et al, 1990;Wogel et al, 2002;Haddad and Sazima, 2004;Pimenta et al, 2005;Weber et al, 2005b) by the frequency modulation and the absence of pulses; ii) P. albifrons group by the shorter duration of the call of P. biligonigerus and P. santafecinus (Barrio, 1965), and by the higher minimal, maximum, and dominant frequencies than that found in P. marmoratus (Giaretta and Menin, 2004); iii) P. cuvieri group by a lower dominant frequency and a lower number of harmonics than P. albonotatus (Barrio, 1965), by a higher number of harmonics than P. cuvieri (Cardoso, 1981), and by a longer duration of the call and lower dominant and maximum frequencies than P. erikae ; iv) P. henseli group by the absence of harmonics in P. fernandezae and P. henselii (Barrio, 1965), longer duration and higher minimum frequency than P. riograndensis (Barrio, 1965); v) P. olfersii group by shorter call duration, except P. aguirrei , from which P. barrioi differs by the higher dominant and minimum frequencies; vi) P. gracilis group by higher call duration and lower number of harmonics than P. gracilis (Barrio, 1965), presence of pulses in P. jordanensis (Bokermann, 1967), and lower number of harmonics and by having higher minimal frequency than P. evangelistai (Bokermann, 1967). In his description of the call of P. barrioi, Bokermann (1967) found 21 harmonics not detected by us.…”