2012
DOI: 10.1643/ch-10-142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redescription of Physalaemus barrioi (Anura: Leiuperidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After that, the forest expanded and the landscape changed dramatically, which might have contributed to the local decline of this population. The same seems to be the case for other endemic species, which were known to inhabit the Campo de Fruticultura, such as Physalaemus barrioi that now is found only in open areas in the buffer area of the Park (Provete et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…After that, the forest expanded and the landscape changed dramatically, which might have contributed to the local decline of this population. The same seems to be the case for other endemic species, which were known to inhabit the Campo de Fruticultura, such as Physalaemus barrioi that now is found only in open areas in the buffer area of the Park (Provete et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The five species of the P. signifer Group already karyotyped (i.e., P. atlanticus, P. crombiei, P. moreirae, P. spiniger and P. signifer) have a telocentric chromosome pair as the smallest pair (chromosome pair 11) of the complement (de Lucca et al, 1974;Silva et al, 2000;Ananias et al, 2007), as do P. nattereri (Beçak, 1968;Lourenço et al, 2006;Ananias et al, 2007) and P. deimaticus (present work), which is the only species of the P. deimaticus Group karyotyped to date. In contrast, the remaining 23 species of Physalaemus studied cytogenetically have a biarmed chromosome pair 11 (Beçak et al, 1970;Denaro, 1972;de Lucca et al, 1974;Silva et al, 1999Silva et al, , 2000Amaral et al, 2000;Quinderé et al, 2009;Tomatis et al, 2009;Milani et al, 2010;Nascimento et al, 2010;Provete et al, 2012;Vittorazzi et al, 2014), except for P. fernandezae ). The phylogenetic relationships inferred herein provide strong evidence for the independent origin of the telocentric chromosome 11 of P. fernandezae and the chromosome 11 of species previously allocated to the P. signifer Group, corroborating the hypothesis discussed by Tomatis et al (2009).…”
Section: The Physalaemus Signifer Cladementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, an undescribed species from Argentina and Brazil (traditionally assigned to P. gracilis, Barrio 1965) was recovered nested within this clade. No morphological synapomorphy supports the composition of this group, and the cytogenetic information is very fragmented, with chromosome data available only for P. barrioi (Provete et al, 2012) and P. gracilis The Physalaemus olfersii Group, as defined by Nascimento et al (2005), was polyphyletic in all our analyses because P. aguirrei is not closely related to the clade composed of P. olfersii, P. soaresi, P. maximus, P. feioi and P. lateristriga; therefore, P.…”
Section: The Physalaemus Gracilis Species Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The internal oral morphology of Physalaemus species is discussed on the basis of the information presented in recent studies on the larvae of this genus (Ruggeri and Weber, 2012;Provete et al, 2012). Similarly, information on buecal features of other leiuperids was taken from studies by Wassersug and Heyer (1988) and Barrasso et al (2012), and references cited therein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%