Tactile feedback on mid-air gestural interaction with a large fogscreen

Sand, Antti; Remizova, Vera; MacKenzie, I. Scott; Špakov, Oleg; Nieminen, Katariina; Rakkolainen, Ismo; Kylliäinen, Anneli; Surakka, Veikko; Kuosmanen, Julia

doi:10.1145/3377290.3377316

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Putting together the findings on throughput, movement time, target re-entries, and subjective ratings, it seems that tapping without haptic feedback was the best hand selection gesture for physical interaction with a fogscreen. Thus, these findings are consistent with the previous findings of Sand et al [10]. Notably, our findings hold value, as prior research on mid-air gesture interaction has been critical of tapping selection gestures, has not explicitly demonstrated the excellence of these specific pushing forward gestures, and has recommended care in their use [13,21].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Early studies and experiments indicate that fogscreens have immense potential as an interaction medium, offering unique and innovative ways for people to interact with digital content and technology [3,10]. Fogscreens are most engaging when the audience can directly interact and play with them.…”

Section: Particle Displaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To provide haptic feedback, we developed a lightweight wireless wearable vibrotactile actuation device. The design of the device was inspired by the haptic device created by Sand et al [10]. Our design used an Arduino Nano microcontroller board in combination with an HC-05 serial Bluetooth radio and a Texas Instruments DRV2605L haptic motor controller, which incorporated an eccentric rotating mass (ERM) vibration motor.…”

Section: Haptic Devicementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Mid-Air Gestural Interaction with a Large Fogscreen

Remizova,

Sand,

MacKenzie

et al. 2023

MTI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Projected walk-through fogscreens have been created, but there is little research on the evaluation of the interaction performance with fogscreens. The present study investigated mid-air hand gestures for interaction with a large fogscreen. Participants (N = 20) selected objects from a fogscreen using tapping and dwell-based gestural techniques, with and without vibrotactile/haptic feedback. In terms of Fitts’ law, the throughput was about 1.4 bps to 2.6 bps, suggesting that gestural interaction with a large fogscreen is a suitable and effective input method. Our results also suggest that tapping without haptic feedback has good performance and potential for interaction with a fogscreen, and that tactile feedback is not necessary for effective mid-air interaction. These findings have implications for the design of gestural interfaces suitable for interaction with fogscreens.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Particle Displaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Haptic Devicementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mid-Air Gestural Interaction with a Large Fogscreen

Remizova,

Sand,

MacKenzie

et al. 2023

MTI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There have been numerous works [Harrison et al 2011], [Sand et al 2020] that project interfaces onto surfaces. Since these systems use an external 30 fps depth camera and image processing they have a longer reaction time.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interactive Minimal Latency Laser Graphics Pipeline

Haebich

Sandor

Cassinelli

2020

SIGGRAPH Asia 2020 Emerging Technologies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present the design and implementation of a "Laser Graphics Processing Unit" (LGPU) featuring a proposed re-configurable graphics pipeline capable of minimal latency interactive feedback, without the need of computer communication. This is a novel approach for creating interactive graphics where a simple program describes the interaction on a vertex. Similar in design to a geometry or fragment shader on a GPU, these programs are uploaded on initialisation and do not require input from any external micro-controller while running. The interaction shader takes input from a light sensor and updates the vertex and fragment shader, an operation that can be parallelised. Once loaded onto our prototype LGPU the pipeline can create laser graphics that react within 4 ms of interaction and can run without input from a computer. The pipeline achieves this low latency by having the interaction shader communicate with the geometry and vertex shaders that are also running on the LGPU. This enables the creation of low latency displays such as car counters, musical instrument interfaces, and non-touch projected widgets or buttons. From our testing we were able to achieve a reaction time of 4 ms and from a range of up to 15 m. CCS CONCEPTS • Hardware → Sensor applications and deployments; Emerging interfaces.

show abstract

A Survey on Haptic Technologies for Mobile Augmented Reality

BermejoCarlos

HuiPan

2021

ACM Comput. Surv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Augmented reality (AR) applications have gained much research and industry attention. Moreover, the mobile counterpart—mobile augmented reality (MAR) is one of the most explosive growth areas for AR applications in the mobile environment (e.g., smartphones). The technical improvements in the hardware of smartphones, tablets, and smart-glasses provide an advantage for the wide use of mobile AR in the real world and experience these AR applications anywhere. However, the mobile nature of MAR applications can limit users’ interaction capabilities, such as input and haptic feedback. In this survey, we analyze current research issues in the area of human-computer interaction for haptic technologies in MAR scenarios. The survey first presents human sensing capabilities and their applicability in AR applications. We classify haptic devices into two groups according to the triggered sense: cutaneous/tactile : touch, active surfaces, and mid-air; kinesthetic : manipulandum, grasp, and exoskeleton. Due to MAR applications’ mobile capabilities, we mainly focus our study on wearable haptic devices for each category and their AR possibilities. To conclude, we discuss the future paths that haptic feedback should follow for MAR applications and their challenges.

show abstract

Tactile feedback on mid-air gestural interaction with a large fogscreen

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

Mid-Air Gestural Interaction with a Large Fogscreen

Mid-Air Gestural Interaction with a Large Fogscreen

Interactive Minimal Latency Laser Graphics Pipeline

A Survey on Haptic Technologies for Mobile Augmented Reality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About