2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tackling Poor Specificity of Cocaine Color Tests by Electrochemical Strategies

Abstract: This paper presents electrochemical strategies for the fast screening of cocaine and most common cutting agents found in seized drug samples. First, a study on the performance of Scott color tests on cocaine and a wide range of cutting agents is described. The cutting agents causing false positive or false negative results when in mixture with cocaine are identified. To overcome the lack of specificity of color tests, we further propose a fast screening strategy by means of square wave voltammetry on disposabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 A well-known limitation of these cobalt(II)thiocyanate-based tests is their false-positive (FP) response to several common adulterants such as levamisole and lidocaine. 11 This is a major drawback as levamisole is one of the most frequently used cutting agents, present in more than 40% of seized cocaine samples. 12 It is therefore not unlikely to encounter pure levamisole, or…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 A well-known limitation of these cobalt(II)thiocyanate-based tests is their false-positive (FP) response to several common adulterants such as levamisole and lidocaine. 11 This is a major drawback as levamisole is one of the most frequently used cutting agents, present in more than 40% of seized cocaine samples. 12 It is therefore not unlikely to encounter pure levamisole, or…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Also, electrochemical tests that can overcome the specificity issues of the Scott test have been developed. 11,17 However, both electrochemical tests and ATR-FT-IR spectroscopy still require touching and handling of sample material. Raman spectroscopy and near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy are two techniques that can analyze through the packaging material without handling the sample and can be operated by minimally trained staff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexation with the cobalt thiocyanate in the cocaine colorimetric test could also take place in the presence of other compounds, causing the test to turn blue, thus leading to a false positive result. Moreover the test is influenced by temperature and the color interpretation is subjective (De Jong et al, 2018b ). Therefore, (bio)sensing strategies in detecting drugs offer a clear advantage compared to colorimetric tests, with increased selectivity and comparable analysis time.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a substance such as cocaine, the most common presumptive test being used is the Scott color test. As can been seen in Table , the sensitivity and specificity of this test are 0.68, 0.75 respectively (de Jong et al, ), giving an LR for a positive result of 2.72 (Table ). As shown in the earlier examples, if we wish to assess the posterior probabilities provided by a specific test, we need to assign relevant, reliable prior probabilities (which could be informed by studies on prevalence) in the circumstances being examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because of this risk of misleading inferences from negative results, the development of presumptive tests has concentrated on improving the sensitivity and specificity (and hence the magnitude of the LRs) of such tests. For example, an electrochemical test for the detection of cocaine has improved the sensitivity and specificity of cocaine detection to 0.93 and 0.86 respectively (de Jong et al, ) (Table ). This leads to an increased LR for positive detection (6.64 for the electrochemical test compared to 2.72 for the color test) and a decrease in the LR for a negative detection (0.08 for the electrochemical test compared to 0.43 for the color test).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%