2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00030-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
224
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
224
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…According to (Fong, Ooi, Tan, Lee, & Chong, 2011), knowledge might show slight results in case if it is not widely shared among the employees within the organization; as a result, it causes employees to find better opportunities in other organization. (Koskinena, Pihlantob, & Vanharantaa, 2003) Defined two types of knowledge's: explicit knowledge that shares the information among the employees and tacit knowledge that is difficult to share among the employees such as belief and experience.…”
Section: Strategic Hrm Practices and Organizational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (Fong, Ooi, Tan, Lee, & Chong, 2011), knowledge might show slight results in case if it is not widely shared among the employees within the organization; as a result, it causes employees to find better opportunities in other organization. (Koskinena, Pihlantob, & Vanharantaa, 2003) Defined two types of knowledge's: explicit knowledge that shares the information among the employees and tacit knowledge that is difficult to share among the employees such as belief and experience.…”
Section: Strategic Hrm Practices and Organizational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would suggest that Dreyfus' criticism of artificial intelligence aligns with the existing criticism of the project management community's attempts to codify its practice in the bodies of knowledge and various methodologies . That is, management of projects cannot be reduced to a standard set of rules or procedures to be followed because a large portion of the interactions by project participants and stakeholders (with their Dasein mode of being) are tacit, contextual and transparent (Blomquist et al 2010;Cicmil et al 2006;Koskinen, Pihlanto & Vanharanta 2003). The rules emerge dynamically out of the totality of the changing situation.…”
Section: Dealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, existing research identified trust as an important factor for successful knowledge sharing [25][26][27]. Koskinen et al [28] noted that the greater the level of trust, the greater the level of people accessibility, and the greater the chance knowledge is shared in the team. Furthermore, Inkpen and Tsang [25] agreed that an atmosphere of trust contributes to the free exchange of knowledge, because people do not feel they have to protect themselves from others' opportunistic behaviours.…”
Section: Knowledge Management From the Lens Of Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%