2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Heideggerian paradigm for project management: Breaking free of the disciplinary matrix and its Cartesian ontology

Abstract: Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to identify the new insights that emerge if key concepts in Heidegger's magnum opus Being and Time are applied to the phenomena of projects and their management. A theoretical approach is adopted with an introduction being provided to key Being and Time concepts, followed by the application of these concepts to the phenomena of projects and their management. A particular focus is on the relevance of Heidegger's ontology in underpinning the exploration of the 'lived experie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Bredillet 2005(Bredillet , 2013Bredillet, Hatcher & Tywoniak 2013;Bredillet, Tywoniak & Dwivedula 2015). Also, the value of Heideggerian and more broadly, continental philosophical perspectives for bringing a practice grounding to project management research have been proposed by van der Hoorn and Whitty (2015b) and van der Hoorn (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Bredillet 2005(Bredillet , 2013Bredillet, Hatcher & Tywoniak 2013;Bredillet, Tywoniak & Dwivedula 2015). Also, the value of Heideggerian and more broadly, continental philosophical perspectives for bringing a practice grounding to project management research have been proposed by van der Hoorn and Whitty (2015b) and van der Hoorn (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This community publishes (although not exclusively) and is involved in the editorial of journals dedicated to projects, most notably, the International Journal of Project Management, Project Management Journal and this journal. The community and its object of study receives a variety of names, representing different perspectives on projects (Jacobsson et al 2015), schools of thought (Söderlund 2011;Bredillet 2010), methodologies (Crawford, Pollack, et al 2006;Smyth & Morris 2007), and paradigms (Pollack 2007;Williams 2005;van der Hoorn & Whitty 2015). Names matter (Pellegrinelli 2011;Geraldi & Teerikangas 2009), but what connects us matter too.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an existentially inspired approach to management, the manager’s analysis in the context of existential motives becomes apparent. Existentials are also evident in the Heideggerian approach to management (Bolle 2006 , Segal 2010 , Van de Hoorn and Whitty 2015 ), which works with the existentialism of Martin Heidegger ( 2001 ), especially that developed in Being and Time . The approach of existential hermeneutic phenomenology (Müller and Jedličková, 2020 ) also works with existential categories, which develops the Heideggerian concept (Rolfe et al 2016 , 2017 ) by the philosophy of Fink ( 1965 , 1969 ) and Patočka (1966, 1998 ).…”
Section: Existential Management and Camus’s Sisyphean Revoltmentioning
confidence: 99%