1968
DOI: 10.21236/ad0671271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tabulations of Propagation Data Over Irregular Terrain in the 230- To 9200-MHZ Frequency Range. Part 1: Gunbarrel Hill Receiver Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Propagation experiments in the 230 to 9200 MHz range conducted over irregular terrain in Colorado are reported by McQuate, Harmanand Barsis (1968). The data for all frequencies were recorded at a single common receiver site located near the summit of Gunbarrel For example, the low losses (plotted high in the figures) shown for paths at d = 27.…”
Section: Gunbarrel Hill Coloradc (R-l)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propagation experiments in the 230 to 9200 MHz range conducted over irregular terrain in Colorado are reported by McQuate, Harmanand Barsis (1968). The data for all frequencies were recorded at a single common receiver site located near the summit of Gunbarrel For example, the low losses (plotted high in the figures) shown for paths at d = 27.…”
Section: Gunbarrel Hill Coloradc (R-l)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the part II of the compilation in [28], geographical and system data from the radio links were available to be replicated in the predictions of the analyzed models. With such information in hands, the respective 2D terrain profiles were reproduced, reading SRTM [29] elevation bases with the aid of an adaptation of a MATLAB ® script intended to plot elevation maps [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ridge electrical parameters were estimated from pertinent references, in special [32]: rb = 13 and sb = 5 mS/m. Regarding the vegetation layer, a narrow range of values was first chosen as proper estimates, based on information from [28], as well as the suggestions in [23]. A single pair of values were considered for all runs of the hybrid model: r1 = 1.23 and s = 0.3 mS/m.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To validate the model, results of MWFDTD calculations are compared with path loss measurements over irregular terrains in Colorado [3].…”
Section: Moving Window Finite Difference Time Domain (Mwfdtd)mentioning
confidence: 99%