1929
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/44.3.186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tabardillo, An American Variety of Typhus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1930
1930
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The American sera, however, do not contain any group agglutinins for X 2, and a similar result has been published recently by Spencer and Maxcy (1930). Should this finding be confirmed by investigations on a larger scale, another peculiarity of the virus of endemic typhus of the United States would thus have been established, in addition to the property of producing conspicuous scrotal and testicular lesions in infected animals, which this virus (Maxcy, 1929 a, b, c;Pinkerton, 1929) shares with those of the Mexican Tabardillo " (Neill, 1917;Mooser, 1928Mooser, , 1929 and of Rocky Mountain spotted fever.…”
Section: Sera Fromsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The American sera, however, do not contain any group agglutinins for X 2, and a similar result has been published recently by Spencer and Maxcy (1930). Should this finding be confirmed by investigations on a larger scale, another peculiarity of the virus of endemic typhus of the United States would thus have been established, in addition to the property of producing conspicuous scrotal and testicular lesions in infected animals, which this virus (Maxcy, 1929 a, b, c;Pinkerton, 1929) shares with those of the Mexican Tabardillo " (Neill, 1917;Mooser, 1928Mooser, , 1929 and of Rocky Mountain spotted fever.…”
Section: Sera Fromsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The comparison with herpes is especially important since, in both herpes and typhus, brain material was used under identical conditions, It would seem from these experiments that the agent of typhus did not, in regard to filtration, fall into the class of the so-caUed "filterable" agents. Its occasional passage through filters which held back bacteria in our own work as in the isolated experiments of NicoUe and his associates, can be taken to indicate that the typhus agent, while larger than the filterable viruses, yet was smaller than a typical small bacterium--a supposition which would be consistent with the observed size of the Mooser bodies (7) (Rickettsia prowazeki seen in the tunica of guinea pigs). Moreover, cultural studies on all the filtrates carried over periods of from 2 to 3 weeks after filtration would indicate that the typhus virus was not bacterial and had no relationship to the occasionally observed diphtheroid organisms that can be cultivated, from time to time, from typhus tunicas.…”
Section: The Filtration Of Typhus Virusmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, the guinea pig is a long-standing host for experimental studies of typhus. One of the results of these early studies was the differentiation of the agent of epidemic typhus fever, Rickettsia prowazeki, from the agent of murine (endemic) typhus fever, Rickettsia mooseri (Rickettsia taphi) (16). Because R. mooseri produces a more severe disease in guinea pigs than R. prowazeki (36) (the converse of their relative virulence for humans), R. mooseri infection in this laboratory animal is often studied as a model of typhus infections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%