“…Similarly, GRE T2 achieved only 56% agreement with DSA ( ϭ 0.31), despite its expected high sensitivity for thrombus detection (81.2%). [15][16][17] In contrast, TR-CE MRA proved a reliable non-time-consuming tool for occlusion location, with 88% agreement with DSA ( ϭ 0.81). The superior diagnostic performance of TR-CE MRA compared with 3D-TOF was not hampered by the lower image quality, probably due to the poorer spatial resolution, and may be the result of several factors: First, the T1 effect of gadolinium compensates for the signal loss caused by spin-dephasing that occurs in 3D-TOF when the flows are slow, turbulent, or oriented parallel to the section plane, in this case essentially upstream of the real occlusion site diagnosed on the DSA (standard of reference) image and especially within the IICA segment.…”