1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5728(99)00107-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

T cell response to myelin basic protein before and after treatment with interferon beta in multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since its first use, several hundred studies have examined the mechanisms of IFN‐β treatment in MS. The most important mechanisms of action for IFN‐β, which have been shown to include stabilization of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) by blocking matrix metalloproteases in in vitro models and in treated MS patients , the downregulation of HLA class II molecules and antigen presentation on glial cells and B cells in vitro , and the inhibition of proinflammatory and upregulation of Th2 cytokines by T cells of IFN‐β‐treated patients , although some of these observations remain controversial . Whether IFN‐β antiviral activity also contributes to the clinical effects is not clear, but more than 20 years of clinical use have shown that IFN‐β treatment does not lead to any compromise of the immune system with respect to protection against viral, bacterial, or fungal infections.…”
Section: Treatments Of Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its first use, several hundred studies have examined the mechanisms of IFN‐β treatment in MS. The most important mechanisms of action for IFN‐β, which have been shown to include stabilization of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) by blocking matrix metalloproteases in in vitro models and in treated MS patients , the downregulation of HLA class II molecules and antigen presentation on glial cells and B cells in vitro , and the inhibition of proinflammatory and upregulation of Th2 cytokines by T cells of IFN‐β‐treated patients , although some of these observations remain controversial . Whether IFN‐β antiviral activity also contributes to the clinical effects is not clear, but more than 20 years of clinical use have shown that IFN‐β treatment does not lead to any compromise of the immune system with respect to protection against viral, bacterial, or fungal infections.…”
Section: Treatments Of Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experimental studies focused on the IFN-β mechanism of action, the antiproliferative activity, modulation of leukocytes adhesion molecules, inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases activity, alteration of leukocytes trafficking, all affect immune function features, for example modulation of NK cells activity [33], antagonism towards pro-inflammatory cytokines and induction of immunosuppressive cytokines [27] have been established. Many unanswered questions, however, still remain about INF-β.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IFN-ß can influence the outcome of immune cell activation by modifying the response of antigen-presenting cells and T cells to accessory molecule signals. The most relevant immunomodulatory effects of IFN-ß-la are the inhibition of the proliferation of autoreactive T cells, the inhibition of the expression of MHC class II molecules, antagonism toward pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the induction of immunosuppressive ones [10]. But many questions about IFN-ß-la are as yet unanswered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%