2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2012.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systolic Volume Index by Doppler Echocardiography Is an Useful Marker for Stratification and Prognostic Evaluation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we found that myocardial fibrosis assessed by MRI was common in the NFLG group although markers of filling pressure (E/e′ and BNP) were lower than in patients with high gradients. These findings corroborate data from previous studies [5][6][7] and further extend them because we found that despite differences in remodeling, patients with NFLG tend to have similar symptoms as NFHG patients. The less extensive valvular pathology with less LV/LA remodeling seen in NFLG and suggest that this phenotype of AS is a milder form than NFHG with the same symptom burden.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we found that myocardial fibrosis assessed by MRI was common in the NFLG group although markers of filling pressure (E/e′ and BNP) were lower than in patients with high gradients. These findings corroborate data from previous studies [5][6][7] and further extend them because we found that despite differences in remodeling, patients with NFLG tend to have similar symptoms as NFHG patients. The less extensive valvular pathology with less LV/LA remodeling seen in NFLG and suggest that this phenotype of AS is a milder form than NFHG with the same symptom burden.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Not infrequently, however, patients present with apparently normal SVi, a morphologically severely stenotic valve, an estimated aortic valve area (AVA <1 cm 2 ), but only a moderately elevated mean gradient (<40 mm Hg). This condition termed normal-flow low-gradient (NFLG) AS is relatively common, with an estimated prevalence among patients with AS ranging from 13% to 31% [2][3][4][5][6][7] and associated with a favorable prognosis compared with other AS groups. 2,5,7,8 The benefit of AVR in these patients is controversial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these patients had larger left atrial dimension and volume, while RWT in the HMG/LF group, as revealed in our study and by a number of other investigators. 20,21 Diastolic function appears early in the course of AS, 23,24 and, in our study, it was more advanced in the HMG/LF group compared with the HMG/NF group. It was expressed as bigger left atria, lower mitral flow E velocities, and higher values of the E/E'.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Indeed, Hachicha and colleagues initially described “paradoxical” low‐flow AS (PLF AS) and subsequent studies confirmed that PLF AS is not uncommon in clinical practice . Moreover, patients with PLF AS generally have worse clinical outcomes than patients with normal flow AS (NF AS) and PLF AS patients also benefit from valve replacement when symptomatic …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Moreover, patients with PLF AS generally have worse clinical outcomes than patients with normal flow AS (NF AS) and PLF AS patients also benefit from valve replacement when symptomatic. [8][9][10][11] Investigations of the potential mechanisms of low flow despite apparently normal systolic function have focused on the left heart and have implicated reduced left ventricular (LV) cavity size from remodeling and hypertrophy, intrinsic LV systolic dysfunction not measured by LVEF, and increased systemic afterload. 4,7,[12][13][14] However, the role of right ventricular (RV) function in patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF is not known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%