2017
DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.117.006580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative Reverse Remodeling and Symptomatic Improvement in Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement

Abstract: Background-Severe aortic stenosis (AS) most often presents with reduced aortic valve area (<1 cm 2 ), normal stroke volume index (≥35 mL/m 2 ), and either high mean gradient (≥40 mm Hg; normal-flow high-gradient AS) or low mean gradient (normal-flow low-gradient [NFLG] AS). The benefit of aortic valve replacement (AVR) among NFLG patients is controversial. We compared the impact of NFLG condition on preoperative left ventricular (LV) remodeling and myocardial fibrosis and postoperative remodeling and symptomat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus interesting that we demonstrate that EF1 provided the strongest prognostic data among patient with low gradient severe AS (discordant AS), as the management of these patients is controversial. Although there may be some symptomatic benefit after AVR among patients with normal-flow, low-gradient AS, 7 the prognostic benefit is debated 28 29 and recommendations are to generally manage them as moderate AS. 1 Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS patients often have a slower progression of disease than AS patients with a high gradient and more rarely progress to AVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is thus interesting that we demonstrate that EF1 provided the strongest prognostic data among patient with low gradient severe AS (discordant AS), as the management of these patients is controversial. Although there may be some symptomatic benefit after AVR among patients with normal-flow, low-gradient AS, 7 the prognostic benefit is debated 28 29 and recommendations are to generally manage them as moderate AS. 1 Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS patients often have a slower progression of disease than AS patients with a high gradient and more rarely progress to AVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a retrospective study including two previously well-described prospective cohort studies performed at our institution between 2014 and 2017. 7 8 The first cohort included asymptomatic patients with aortic valve area (AVA) <1 cm 2 , maximal aortic peak velocity >3.5 m/s and LVEF >50% recruited at the outpatient clinic. Patients underwent a conventional cycle ergometer test to ascertain that they were truly asymptomatic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 24,000 cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans were performed between 2007 and 2017 as part of clinical examinations at Odense University Hospital, or as part of research studies at five centres (Odense, Svendborg, Vejle, Esbjerg, Silkeborg). After approval from the Danish Data Protection Agency, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and CAC scores were collected from the electronic patient databases at Odense University Hospital, the Western Denmark Heart Registry [ 12 ], The National Danish Ablation Database [ 13 ], and research databases (DANCAVAS [ 14 ], DanRisk [ 15 ], IDA [ 16 ], MYODAN [ 17 ], NOTICE [ 18 ], AMFAST [ 19 ], and Ilangkovan N et al [ 20 ].). The study participants’ medication status since 2004 was collected from the Danish National Health Service Prescription Database (DNHSPD) [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ablation Database [13], and research databases (DANCAVAS [14], DanRisk [15], IDA [16], MYODAN [17], NOTICE [18], AMFAST [19], and Ilangkovan N et al [20].). The study participants' medication status since 2004 was collected from the Danish National Health Service Prescription Database (DNHSPD) [21].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a retrospective study including two previously well described prospective cohort studies performed at our institution between 2014 and 2017 9,10 . The first cohort included asymptomatic patients with aortic valve area (AVA) < 1 cm 2 , maximal aortic peak velocity > 3.5 m/sec and LV ejection fraction (EF) > 50% recruited at the outpatient clinic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%