2015
DOI: 10.1002/smr.1754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systems dynamics model for decision support in risk assessment in software projects

Abstract: Project management is widely studied and has several tools that aid in the efficiency and effectiveness of software production. However, in project management, numerous risk factors are involved in the development of software. These risk factors interact in a dynamic and non-linear way, hindering decisionmaking. The objective of this paper is to present a model of systems dynamics, which is a descriptive technique used for modeling and simulating systems, involving risk factors that strongly influence the deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that several studies have explored the dynamic of PM through SD models in different fields. These studies have been used for different purposes, as for instance, litigation (Cooper, 1980; Nasirzadeh et al, 2019; Williams et al, 2003), decision‐making process (Lopes et al, 2015; Sadabadi & Kama, 2014), development of policies (Lee et al, 2007; Mashayekhi, 2000; Ogano & Pretorius, 2017) and analysis of human resources in project delivery (Garcia‐Alvarez et al, 2016). In fact, the SD models consider relevant variables associated with the sustainability and innovation (Pargar & Kujala, 2021; Zhou & Liu, 2015), although studies of both have been developed separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results show that several studies have explored the dynamic of PM through SD models in different fields. These studies have been used for different purposes, as for instance, litigation (Cooper, 1980; Nasirzadeh et al, 2019; Williams et al, 2003), decision‐making process (Lopes et al, 2015; Sadabadi & Kama, 2014), development of policies (Lee et al, 2007; Mashayekhi, 2000; Ogano & Pretorius, 2017) and analysis of human resources in project delivery (Garcia‐Alvarez et al, 2016). In fact, the SD models consider relevant variables associated with the sustainability and innovation (Pargar & Kujala, 2021; Zhou & Liu, 2015), although studies of both have been developed separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdel-Hamid and Madnick (1987) and the constructive cost model (COCOMO) (Boehm, 1981) are the most widely known software models for PM. The COCOMO model (or COCOMO 81) was further supported by Madachy (1996) to simulate the effect of an inspectionbased software life cycle process, in line with tasks, errors and effects (Farshchi et al, 2012;Lee & Miller, 2004), technical issues (Rus et al, 1999) and risk (Lopes et al, 2015). This COCOMO model was first published in the book "Software Engineering Economics" by Boehm (1981).…”
Section: Stage 2: Pm Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Segundo Sterman (1992), para se entender de forma efetiva o sistema dinâmico do projeto, se faz necessária a aplicação de modelos estruturados que demonstrem as múltiplas relações e impactos que mudanças podem acarretar. Lopes et al (2015) ressaltam que os fatores de risco interagem de forma dinâmica e não linear, dificultando as tomadas de decisões.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified