2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic toxicity of di (2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA) in rats following 28-day intravenous exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, repeat dose toxicity studies after IV exposure are more relevant for the parenteral route of exposure leaching from medical devices (meaning 100% bioavailability). As shown in Table 4, studies assessing toxicity after IV exposure (Cammack et al, 2003;David et al, 2015;Wirnitzer et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2019) show that the safety margin of APs exceeds that of DEHP less than after oral exposure, DEHT 6 compared to more than 20 times, and DINCH 5 compared to 8 times. Despite being used in different medical devices used for infusion and transfusion, the toxicity of DINP, DEHA and ATBC has not been assessed after IV exposure.…”
Section: Health Effects Of Alternative Plasticizersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, repeat dose toxicity studies after IV exposure are more relevant for the parenteral route of exposure leaching from medical devices (meaning 100% bioavailability). As shown in Table 4, studies assessing toxicity after IV exposure (Cammack et al, 2003;David et al, 2015;Wirnitzer et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2019) show that the safety margin of APs exceeds that of DEHP less than after oral exposure, DEHT 6 compared to more than 20 times, and DINCH 5 compared to 8 times. Despite being used in different medical devices used for infusion and transfusion, the toxicity of DINP, DEHA and ATBC has not been assessed after IV exposure.…”
Section: Health Effects Of Alternative Plasticizersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, trimellitates, citrates, and adipates, including tris­(2-ethylhexyl) trimellitate (TOTM), tributyl- O -acetyl citrate (ATBC), and di­(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA), have been expanded to apply as PAE alternatives in electronics, apparels, and building materials . Meanwhile, they were also detected in various indoor environments. Recently, isophthalate esters, cyclohexene dicarboxylic acid esters, and new cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid esters have been developed as the next generation of PAE alternatives. Di­(2-ethylhexyl) isophthalate (DEHIP), di­(2-ethylhexyl) tetrahydrophthalate (DEHTH), di­(2-ethylhexyl) cyclohexane-1,4-dicarboxylate (1,4-DEHCH), and di­(2-ethylhexyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (1,2-DEHCH) are typical representatives, and some of them have been found in food contact materials and children’s toys. , Although most manufacturers declare that these non-phthalate plasticizers have no substance-related toxicity and are environmentally friendly, mounting evidence shows that they exhibit various toxic effects, including endocrine-disrupting activity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, cytotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and carcinogenicity. Therefore, human exposure to these emerging PAE alternatives is still a great concern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%