2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic toxicity eliciting metal ion levels from metallic implants and orthopedic devices – A mini review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the working concentrations of reported metal nanoparticles, recently reported ultrasmall copper oxide [13] and manganese dioxide nanoparticles [30] might manifest better catalytic e ciency than Ta-NH 2 NPs. However, these metal nanomaterials might be ionized by body uid [15] to generate free metal ions, which further led to element imbalance or even metal poisoning [16,17]. In addition, compared with inert metal such as cerium and gold nanoparticles [31], Ta-NH 2 NPs showed stronger H 2 O 2 decomposition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the working concentrations of reported metal nanoparticles, recently reported ultrasmall copper oxide [13] and manganese dioxide nanoparticles [30] might manifest better catalytic e ciency than Ta-NH 2 NPs. However, these metal nanomaterials might be ionized by body uid [15] to generate free metal ions, which further led to element imbalance or even metal poisoning [16,17]. In addition, compared with inert metal such as cerium and gold nanoparticles [31], Ta-NH 2 NPs showed stronger H 2 O 2 decomposition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reactive metal-based nanomaterials have displayed good bioavailability and excellent therapeutic e ciency at very low concentration (≈ nM/mL) to treat oxidative stress-related diseases in animal model. However, the potential disadvantages such as ionization in body uid [15] and uncertainty of long-term metal cumulation [16,17] still impede its clinical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following section, we will evaluate the existing antimicrobial nanotechnologies with respect to their potential pathways leading to antimicrobial resistance. We also refer readers to more comprehensive reviews that focus more on the antimicrobial mechanisms and toxicological aspects of various nanotechnologies [ [135] , [136] , [137] ].…”
Section: Microbial Resistance To Nanotechnologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapeutic approaches for bone fracture fixation and stabilization commonly rely on the use of non-degradable biomaterials with adequate mechanical properties and biocompatibility—namely metallic implants based on stainless steel, titanium, and cobalt-chromium alloys—that present a high corrosion resistance and are able to maintain long-term structural stability of the tissues [ 1 , 2 ]. Despite the overall adequacy, some biological limitations have been reported with long-term use, including physical irritation, chronic immuno-inflammatory activation, and the release of cytotoxic elements that may hinder biological responses and entail a second surgical procedure for implant removal, increasing morbidity, hospitalization time, and consequently healthcare costs [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Further, elastic modulus differences between non-resorbable metallic implants and bone tissue may induce stress shielding that can interfere with bone turnover exceling bone loss, ultimately leading to fixation deterioration that culminates with the need of a revision surgery [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%