2018
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.1607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic banks, capital composition, and CoCo bonds issuance: The effects on bank risk

Abstract: This paper shows that systemic banks are prone to increase their regulatory capital ratio through a decline in risk‐weighted assets density and an intense use of lower level capital. The market access of systemic banks and the fact that they were singled out for higher capital requirements seem to have biased them towards lower level capital, consistent with the theory that asymmetric information drives capital decisions. These effects are particularly strong for institutions that had a rather low level of cap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our sample can be considered as sufficiently representative of the European bank landscape. The combination of cross‐section and time series data gives a final sample of 395 observations, a sample size comparable to other studies on the banking sector (Almaqtari, Al‐Homaidi, Tabash, & Farhan, 2019; Anderson, Ruiz‐Ortega, & Tressel, 2017; Echevarria‐Icaza & Sosvilla‐Rivero, 2018; Kusi & Opoku‐Mensah, 2018; Loaba & Zahonogo, 2019; Lobão, Pacheco, & Campos, 2019; Ofori‐Sasu, Mensah, Akuma, & Doku, 2019; Salih, Ghecham, & Al‐Barghouthi, 2019). Data regarding the balance sheet and market prices were obtained from the Thomson Reuters Eikon database.…”
Section: Empirical Designmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Thus, our sample can be considered as sufficiently representative of the European bank landscape. The combination of cross‐section and time series data gives a final sample of 395 observations, a sample size comparable to other studies on the banking sector (Almaqtari, Al‐Homaidi, Tabash, & Farhan, 2019; Anderson, Ruiz‐Ortega, & Tressel, 2017; Echevarria‐Icaza & Sosvilla‐Rivero, 2018; Kusi & Opoku‐Mensah, 2018; Loaba & Zahonogo, 2019; Lobão, Pacheco, & Campos, 2019; Ofori‐Sasu, Mensah, Akuma, & Doku, 2019; Salih, Ghecham, & Al‐Barghouthi, 2019). Data regarding the balance sheet and market prices were obtained from the Thomson Reuters Eikon database.…”
Section: Empirical Designmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…More recently two papers grasped CoCos from the point of view of systemic risk. Echevarria‐Icaza and Sosvilla‐Rivero (2017) show by decomposing banks' capital that the regulatory capital requirements imposed since 2009 have led systemic banks to favour the issuance of PWD CoCos in order to minimize dilution effects. In another empirical analysis, Fajardo and Mendes (2019) show that the first issuance reduces systemic risk while subsequent issuances may adversely increase it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%