2009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic Antimicrobial Therapy in Osteomyelitis

Abstract: Appropriately designed antibiotic regimens are critical to the management of all stages of osteomyelitis, although goals of therapy may vary in different stages of infection. The most important consideration for antibiotic selection is spectrum of action. Route of administration by intravenous or oral route is less important than drug levels that are achievable at the site of infection. Outpatient parenteral therapy and use of oral agents has simplified delivery of long-term treatment regimens. There are few h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(108 reference statements)
2
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[28][29][30] Concerns exist over the routine use of systemic antibiotics due to their marginal effectiveness, poor tissue penetration, and propensity for antibiotic resistance. [31][32][33][34] A great deal of current research and numerous treatments focus on localized antimicrobial therapies, however, these topical antibiotics and antiseptics typically require multiple applications and may delay wound healing. 28,29 Therefore, the need exists for a topical antibiotic therapy that supports sustained antimicrobial activity, prevents infection, and facilitates timely healing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30] Concerns exist over the routine use of systemic antibiotics due to their marginal effectiveness, poor tissue penetration, and propensity for antibiotic resistance. [31][32][33][34] A great deal of current research and numerous treatments focus on localized antimicrobial therapies, however, these topical antibiotics and antiseptics typically require multiple applications and may delay wound healing. 28,29 Therefore, the need exists for a topical antibiotic therapy that supports sustained antimicrobial activity, prevents infection, and facilitates timely healing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Should this become a significant problem, linezolid or daptomycin may be effective alternatives for treatment of S. aureus biofilm infection. 114 Rifampin has the capacity to kill metabolically dormant sessile bacteria, making it highly useful for musculoskeletal infections of which a biofilm is the focus. 115 Furthermore, it exhibits high bioavailability and has very few known side-effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment regimens extend for 4 to 6 weeks, with durations as long as 8 weeks recommended for treatment of infection due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (2). Commonly used therapies include cefazolin, oxacillin, or vancomycin for coverage of Gram-positive pathogens and cephalosporins, carbapenems, and the ␤-lactamase inhibitor agents for treatment of Gram-negative pathogens (2,3). No other therapies in recent times have received FDA approval.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%