1973
DOI: 10.2307/2330026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Risk and the Horizon Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jensen [9] has shown that the investment horizon affects systematic risk estimation while Levy [ 131 has demonstrated that the Sharpe performance measure can be biased if an inappropriate investment horizon is used in the empirical study. Cheng and Deets [3] have raised some questions about Jensen's instantaneous systematic risk estimation method, Hasty and Fielitz [7] have developed a model for dealing with the problem associated with heterogeneous horizon and Lee [ 101 has developed a method to test whether the investment horizon associated with individual security, portfolio, and mutual fund returns is instantaneous or not. Lee [113 also has derived the relationship between the estimated instantaneous systematic risk and the estimated finite systematic risk and Levhari and Levy [12] have derived relationships between the magnitude of estimated systematic risk and the length of the investment horizon, and have shown that the estimated Treynor performance measure is biased unless a correct investment horizon is used in the empirical analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jensen [9] has shown that the investment horizon affects systematic risk estimation while Levy [ 131 has demonstrated that the Sharpe performance measure can be biased if an inappropriate investment horizon is used in the empirical study. Cheng and Deets [3] have raised some questions about Jensen's instantaneous systematic risk estimation method, Hasty and Fielitz [7] have developed a model for dealing with the problem associated with heterogeneous horizon and Lee [ 101 has developed a method to test whether the investment horizon associated with individual security, portfolio, and mutual fund returns is instantaneous or not. Lee [113 also has derived the relationship between the estimated instantaneous systematic risk and the estimated finite systematic risk and Levhari and Levy [12] have derived relationships between the magnitude of estimated systematic risk and the length of the investment horizon, and have shown that the estimated Treynor performance measure is biased unless a correct investment horizon is used in the empirical analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a subsequent study, Cheng and Deets (1973) contradict Jensen's results by showing that while the logarithmic transformations preserve linearity in CAPM, the estimates of the systematic risk resulting from that transformation are not independent of the horizon length over which measurements are made. Levy (1972) presents a theoretical analysis of the effect of the investment horizon on portfolio measures of performance.…”
Section: Investment Horizonmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Respecification of the CAPM using functional form techniques is a direct result of earlier studies concerning the investment horizon and instantaneous risk (see [8], [12], and [3]). The model format proposed by Jensen in a discussion of the investment horizon was readily amenable to functional form tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%