2016
DOI: 10.7748/ns.30.50.64.s45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic reviews

Abstract: What was the nature of the CPD activity, practice-related feedback and/or event and/or experience in your practice? The CPD article discussed the purpose of systematic reviews in nursing practice. It outlined the process of undertaking a systematic review, and how this can benefit future research and clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T h eh BARRIERSh Scaleh wash developedh inh 1991h toh identifyh theh principalh factorsh perceivedh byh nursesh ash barriersh toh RUh inh theirh practiceh andh contexth (Funkh eth al.,h 1991).h T h eh Scaleh ish composedh ofh 29h statementsh onh ah Likerth scaleh whereh eachh respondenth canh rateh fromh havingh noh impacth toh ah greath impacth onh theirh abilityh toh useh researchh toh informh theirh professionalh practice.h T h eh itemsh in theh BARRIERSh Scaleh wereh developedh byh applyingh h evidence-basedh healthcareh literatureh withh ah focush onh RUh inh nursingh practiceh (Funkh eth al.,h 1991).h T h eh BARRIERSh Scaleh incorporatesh Rogers'h difh usionh ofh innovationsh theoryh andh theh factorsh afh ectingh the adoptionh ofh change,h includingh characteristicsh ofh theh individual,h theh innovation,h theh communicationsh abouth theh innovation,h andh theh settingh whereh theh researchh ish beingh usedh (Rogers,h 2003).h T h eh BARRIERSh Scaleh hash beenh usedh efh ectivelyh inh overh 60h researchh studiesh sinceh itsh inceptionh andh hash beenh theh subjecth ofh severalh systematich reviewsh (Athanasakis,h 2016;h Carlsonh &h Plonczynski,h 2008;h Hutchinsonh &h Johnston,h 2006;h Kajermoh eth al.,h 2010;h Lauh eth al.,h 2016;h Mehrdadh eth al.,h 2015;h Middlebrooksh eth al.,h 2016;h Tuppalh eth al.,h 2019;h Williams,h Perillo,h eth al.,h 2015).h Althoughh mosth studiesh usingh theh BARRIERSh Scaleh haveh focusedh onh nursingh behavioursh andh practicesh inh theh Unitedh Statesh ofh America,h theh Scaleh hash beenh usedh successfullyh toh understandh theh perceptionsh ofh barriersh toh RUh inh multipleh countriesh andh multipleh languagesh andh inh theh contexth ofh otherh alliedh healthh professionalsh (Boer,h 2012;h Lee,h 2016;h Nedjath eth al.,h 2014;h Ntaganira,h 2012;h Stichlerh eth al.,h 2011;h Visherh eth al.,h 2014;h Waldon,h 2015;h Williams,h Brown,h eth al.,h 2015),h demonstratingh theh fh exibility,h sensitivity,h andh usefulnessh ofh theh BARRIERSh Scaleh inh varioush contextsh andh withh diverseh typesh ofh healthh professionals.h T h eh reviewsh confh rmh thereh ish ampleh evidenceh theh Scaleh ish ah reliableh andh validh toolh (Athanasakis,h 2016;h Kajermoh eth al.,h 2010),h andh theh barriersh toh RUh utilizationh mayh varyh basedh onh contextualh factorsh includingh theh countryh andh professionalh grouph beingh studiedh (Athanasakis,h...…”
Section: The Barriers Scale Application To Eho Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…T h eh BARRIERSh Scaleh wash developedh inh 1991h toh identifyh theh principalh factorsh perceivedh byh nursesh ash barriersh toh RUh inh theirh practiceh andh contexth (Funkh eth al.,h 1991).h T h eh Scaleh ish composedh ofh 29h statementsh onh ah Likerth scaleh whereh eachh respondenth canh rateh fromh havingh noh impacth toh ah greath impacth onh theirh abilityh toh useh researchh toh informh theirh professionalh practice.h T h eh itemsh in theh BARRIERSh Scaleh wereh developedh byh applyingh h evidence-basedh healthcareh literatureh withh ah focush onh RUh inh nursingh practiceh (Funkh eth al.,h 1991).h T h eh BARRIERSh Scaleh incorporatesh Rogers'h difh usionh ofh innovationsh theoryh andh theh factorsh afh ectingh the adoptionh ofh change,h includingh characteristicsh ofh theh individual,h theh innovation,h theh communicationsh abouth theh innovation,h andh theh settingh whereh theh researchh ish beingh usedh (Rogers,h 2003).h T h eh BARRIERSh Scaleh hash beenh usedh efh ectivelyh inh overh 60h researchh studiesh sinceh itsh inceptionh andh hash beenh theh subjecth ofh severalh systematich reviewsh (Athanasakis,h 2016;h Carlsonh &h Plonczynski,h 2008;h Hutchinsonh &h Johnston,h 2006;h Kajermoh eth al.,h 2010;h Lauh eth al.,h 2016;h Mehrdadh eth al.,h 2015;h Middlebrooksh eth al.,h 2016;h Tuppalh eth al.,h 2019;h Williams,h Perillo,h eth al.,h 2015).h Althoughh mosth studiesh usingh theh BARRIERSh Scaleh haveh focusedh onh nursingh behavioursh andh practicesh inh theh Unitedh Statesh ofh America,h theh Scaleh hash beenh usedh successfullyh toh understandh theh perceptionsh ofh barriersh toh RUh inh multipleh countriesh andh multipleh languagesh andh inh theh contexth ofh otherh alliedh healthh professionalsh (Boer,h 2012;h Lee,h 2016;h Nedjath eth al.,h 2014;h Ntaganira,h 2012;h Stichlerh eth al.,h 2011;h Visherh eth al.,h 2014;h Waldon,h 2015;h Williams,h Brown,h eth al.,h 2015),h demonstratingh theh fh exibility,h sensitivity,h andh usefulnessh ofh theh BARRIERSh Scaleh inh varioush contextsh andh withh diverseh typesh ofh healthh professionals.h T h eh reviewsh confh rmh thereh ish ampleh evidenceh theh Scaleh ish ah reliableh andh validh toolh (Athanasakis,h 2016;h Kajermoh eth al.,h 2010),h andh theh barriersh toh RUh utilizationh mayh varyh basedh onh contextualh factorsh includingh theh countryh andh professionalh grouph beingh studiedh (Athanasakis,h...…”
Section: The Barriers Scale Application To Eho Practicementioning
confidence: 99%