Systematic review protocol examining the effectiveness of hospital clowns for symptom cluster management in paediatrics

Abstract

IntroductionClown intervention may playing an important complementary role in paediatric care and recovery. However, data on its utility for symptom cluster management of hospitalised children and adolescents in acute and chronic disorders are yet to be critically evaluated. As clinicians strive to minimise the psychological burden during hospitalisation, it is important that they are aware of the scientific evidences available regarding clown intervention for symptom management. We aim to provide quality evidence for the effectiveness of clown intervention on symptom cluster management in paediatric inpatients, both in acute and chronic conditions.Methods and analysisA systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs) will be conducted. MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS and SciELO databases will be searched from January 2000 to December 2018. Primary outcomes will include measures related with the effect of clown intervention on symptom cluster of paediatric inpatients (anxiety, depression, pain, fatigue, stress and psychological, emotional responses and perceived well-being). Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and the methodological appraisal of the studies will be assessed by the Jadad Scale as well as Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for RCTs, and Risk-of-Bias In Non-Randomized Studies Tool for NRCTs. A narrative synthesis will be conducted for all included studies. Also, if sufficient data are available, a meta-analysis will be conducted. The effect sizes will be generated using Hedges’ g score for both fixed and random effect models. I 2 statistics will be used to assess heterogeneity and identify their potential sources.Ethics and disseminationAs it will be a systematic review, without human beings involvement, there will be no requirement for ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publication and in various media, for example, conferences, congresses or symposia.Trial registration numberCRD42018107099.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health of young people and adults: a systematic review protocol of observational studies

“…SMD was chosen as a measure of pooled results considering the likely variability in the measuring scales for continuous outcomes. 36 The effect size will be interpreted by Cohen’s proposal: 0.20 corresponds to a small effect size, 0.50 corresponds to a medium effect size and 0.80 corresponds to a large effect size. 37 …”

“…SMD was chosen as a measure of pooled results considering the likely variability in the measuring scales for continuous outcomes. 36 The effect size will be interpreted by Cohen's proposal: 0.20 corresponds to a small effect size, 0.50 corresponds to a medium effect size and 0.80 corresponds to a large effect size. 37 A random-effects model will be selected under the assumption that studies included in the meta-analysis have been carried out with heterogeneous populations.…”

Efficacy of the complementary therapies in the management of cancer pain in palliative care: A systematic review

“…Figure 1 shows the final search strategy processed in the respective databases. (TS || =("Adult" AND "Cancer Patients" OR "Advanced Cancer Patients" AND "Neoplasms" OR "Cancer" AND "Palliative Care" OR "Palliative Medicine" OR "Hospices") AND TS=("Complementary Therapies" OR "Therapies, Complementary" OR "Complementary Medicine" OR "Alternative Medicine" OR "Alternative Therapies" OR "Non-pharmacological Interventions") AND TS=("Cancer Pain" OR "Cancer-Associated Pain" "OR "Cancer-Related Pain" OR "Neoplasm Related Pain" OR "Tumor Associated Pain" OR "Oncological Pain" OR "Oncology Pain") AND TS=("Randomized Controlled Trial" OR "Controlled Clinical Trial" OR "Clinical Trial" OR "Random Allocation" OR "Double-blind Method" OR "Single-blind Method")) Data were extracted based on pre-established tools (29)(30)(31) and included four domains: I) Identification of the study, with data such as the title of the article, impact factor of the journal, country of the authors of the study, year of publication, host institution of the study (hospital;…”

Effectiveness of mass testing for control of COVID-19: a systematic review protocol

“…To measure intercoder agreement during each screening phase, Cohen's kappa will be performed. Once consensus is reached on the selected studies, a standardised form based on previous studies [29][30][31][32][33][34] will be used for data extraction. The information to be extracted includes four domains: (1) identification of the study (article title, journal title, impact factor, authors, country of the study, language, sources of funding, publication year, host institution of the study (hospital, university, research centre, single institution and multicentre study), conflicts of interest and study sponsorship); (2) methodological characteristics (study design, study objective or research question or hypothesis, sample characteristics, eg, sample size, age, eligibility criteria, ethnicity and baseline characteristics, groups and controls, recruitment methods and study completion rates, comparator group, timeframe for follow-up, cointerventions, validated measures, costs and/or remuneration related to participation, statistical analyses and adjustments); (3) main findings and implications for clinical practice; and (4) conclusions.…”