The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10070985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review on Pathophysiological Complications in Severe COVID-19 among the Non-Vaccinated and Vaccinated Population

Abstract: COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, is one of the longest viral pandemics in the history of mankind, which have caused millions of deaths globally and induced severe deformities in the survivals. For instance, fibrosis and cavities in the infected lungs of COVID-19 are some of the complications observed in infected patients post COVID-19 recovery. These health abnormalities, including is multiple organ failure—the most striking pathological features of COVID-19—have been linked with diverse distribution of ACE2 re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the future, supplementary comparative studies between these two classes would be desirable in relation also to the use of micronutrients, in addition to those specific to the gender inherent in the adverse effects of vaccination. In this sense, the data are in fact discordant considering that some authors report comparable data between males and females, while others do not, also in relation to the side effects after the first dose of the vaccine [ 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 ].…”
Section: Discussion and Potential Future Approachesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For the future, supplementary comparative studies between these two classes would be desirable in relation also to the use of micronutrients, in addition to those specific to the gender inherent in the adverse effects of vaccination. In this sense, the data are in fact discordant considering that some authors report comparable data between males and females, while others do not, also in relation to the side effects after the first dose of the vaccine [ 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 ].…”
Section: Discussion and Potential Future Approachesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The effectiveness of two doses of mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 was 90–92% ( 70 ), while the effectiveness of the inactivated vaccine was more than 95% ( 69 ). As the vaccination effectively protected persons from being infected, long-term COVID-19 involving PCF was diminished ( 71 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though earlier studies on BAL hinted towards a better proficiency of this specimens (93%) compared to nasal swabs (63%) and pharyngeal swabs (32%), it should be stressed that the former specimens were mostly collected from more severe cases, characterized by a significant involvement of deeper airways [ 41 ]. In individuals where a preventive interaction with the pathogen, either guaranteed by natural infection or vaccination, eventually leads to less invasive infections, airways and mostly bronchiole may be only limitedly affected by viral invasion [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. Lining fluids, in turn, will be only limitedly laden with viral nucleic acids, leading to the poor performances of RT-qPCR because of scarcity or even the absence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%