2019
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07261-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Review of Surgical and Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…51 A recent systematic review by Moris et al provides an elaborate overview of all studies that have utilized IRE for LAPC, with a median overall survival (OS) following IRE between 7 and 27 months ( Table 2). 44 This variance may pertain to selection bias, the utilized IRE approach, the diverse LAPC tumor biology (passive vs aggressive), personalized (neo-) adjuvant chemo-and/or radiotherapy protocols, performance status including comorbidities and other interpersonal patient differences. The additive value of IRE complementary to chemotherapy is becoming increasingly clear and neo-adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment can be used as an effective way to select patients who are likely to benefit from ablation.…”
Section: Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…51 A recent systematic review by Moris et al provides an elaborate overview of all studies that have utilized IRE for LAPC, with a median overall survival (OS) following IRE between 7 and 27 months ( Table 2). 44 This variance may pertain to selection bias, the utilized IRE approach, the diverse LAPC tumor biology (passive vs aggressive), personalized (neo-) adjuvant chemo-and/or radiotherapy protocols, performance status including comorbidities and other interpersonal patient differences. The additive value of IRE complementary to chemotherapy is becoming increasingly clear and neo-adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment can be used as an effective way to select patients who are likely to benefit from ablation.…”
Section: Clinical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average cumulative morbidity for surgical and percutaneous IRE was 36% vs 24%, with an average peri-procedural mortality rate of 2% vs 0%, respectively. 44 Most frequently encountered adverse events comprise GI-related complaints including pain, diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite and delayed gastric emptying. The most severe complications include vessel occlusion, bleeding, severe pancreatitis, and death.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a large systematic review, Moris et al reported that significant toxicities were more common following open or laparoscopic IRE and the percutaneous approach conveyed lower complication rates. 20 Complications of IRE, frequently classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system, have been described. Common low-grade complications include anorexia, dehydration, gastritis, nausea, vomiting, and pancreatitis.…”
Section: Cytoreduction Primary Tumormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0% 26. A recent systematic review of IRE for LAPC failed to show conclusive evidence for improved survival and raised concerns regarding treatment-related adverse events 27. Patient SelectionLAPC patients who cannot receive a standard resection and have shown durable response to neoadjuvant therapy, typically 4 to 12 months with or without radiation, may be candidates for IRE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%