2019
DOI: 10.18800/psico.201901.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review of prosocial behavior measures

Abstract: Measuring prosocial conduct, just as other constructs which are relevant for psychological adjustment, requires a base of knowledge which is orderly and up-to-date, which helps to identify and methodological aspects for its construction. The objective of this study is to identify the instruments for measuring prosocial behavior which are available today in the empirical literature, as well as to analyze their characteristics and psychometric properties. In this study, the bibliographic search was carried out o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
24
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature search was carried out in 5-6 October 2019 using nine frequently used databases, including PubMED (US National Library of Medicine, Maryland, U.S.), Scopus, ScienceDirect (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, U.S.), PsycINFO, PsyschARTICLES (American Psychologist Association, Washington D.C., U.S.), CINAHL (EBSCO Publishing, Massachusetts, U.S.), Cochrane Library (John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, U.S.), and ProQuest (ProQuest LLC, Michigan, U.S.). Guidance on the search terms selected was obtained from recently published systematic reviews on green space (Houlden et al, 2018;Vanaken and Danckaerts, 2018) and prosocial behaviour (Oviedo, 2016;Silke et al, 2018;Vilar et al, 2019). The terms as presented in Table 1 were searched in the titles, abstracts, and/or keywords of the articles.…”
Section: Search Strategy and Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature search was carried out in 5-6 October 2019 using nine frequently used databases, including PubMED (US National Library of Medicine, Maryland, U.S.), Scopus, ScienceDirect (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, U.S.), PsycINFO, PsyschARTICLES (American Psychologist Association, Washington D.C., U.S.), CINAHL (EBSCO Publishing, Massachusetts, U.S.), Cochrane Library (John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, U.S.), and ProQuest (ProQuest LLC, Michigan, U.S.). Guidance on the search terms selected was obtained from recently published systematic reviews on green space (Houlden et al, 2018;Vanaken and Danckaerts, 2018) and prosocial behaviour (Oviedo, 2016;Silke et al, 2018;Vilar et al, 2019). The terms as presented in Table 1 were searched in the titles, abstracts, and/or keywords of the articles.…”
Section: Search Strategy and Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosocial behavior can be interpreted as a social glue that allows people of all ages to live together peacefully and productively [10]. Prosocial behavior can be measured using personal judgment, peer assessment, parent or teacher assessment, and instruments [11]. Developing social behavior is one of the ways to improve the meaningfulness of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research focused on learning if older terminology in current performance review documents is a barrier toward organizational leaders measuring OCBs during formal performance evaluations as compared to the newer terminology used by current researchers to define OCBs and measure employee performance.Organizational leaders must take note that employee retention depends upon providing recognition and rewards for a job well done(Ahn et al, 2018;Sguera et al, 2018;Tourigny et al, 2019). While most employees accept words of appreciation, such as "thank you," or "nice job," many people desire status, title, or monetary rewards(Conzelmann, 2020;Martí-Vilar et al, 2019;Way et al, 2018). Compensation and benefits include incentive strategies for performance improvement and organizational success.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%