2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-02957-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for face and neck rejuvenation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The pain score reported to be low to moderate depending on with or without using analgesics/anesthetics in the literature. 14 In a split face comparison of two different MFU device pain was reported to be much more severe after Ulthera than Ultra-Skin treatment. 15 Two devices were found to have similar efficacy in blinded clinician and quantitative assessment, although there were some differences in patient satisfaction in favor of Ulthera.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pain score reported to be low to moderate depending on with or without using analgesics/anesthetics in the literature. 14 In a split face comparison of two different MFU device pain was reported to be much more severe after Ulthera than Ultra-Skin treatment. 15 Two devices were found to have similar efficacy in blinded clinician and quantitative assessment, although there were some differences in patient satisfaction in favor of Ulthera.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although anesthetics or analgesics were not used in our study, subjects experienced only minimal pain during the treatment. The pain score reported to be low to moderate depending on with or without using analgesics/anesthetics in the literature 14 . In a split face comparison of two different MFU device pain was reported to be much more severe after Ulthera than Ultra‐Skin treatment 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is the first to report the use of a 6-mm deep transducer in facial rejuvenation, especially on the hair-bearing region of the temporal area, which is typically used on other body regions. 12 , 14 Kwon et al proved a 6-mm transducer has benefits for tightening and rejuvenation of the area with unwanted fat. 23 Because both the skin and fat of the lateral temporal and cheek regions are relatively thick, 4.5- and 6-mm transducers were employed to target the SMAS or deeper layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of HIFU transducers to the upper to midface is also limited to only one or two focal depths. 14 Suh et al 11 reported clinical and histologic improvements in a study on 22 Korean participants after treatment with a single HIFU transducer on the forehead (3 mm, 0.3–0.35 J), temples (3 mm, 0.35 J), and malar areas. Park et al 5 recorded a significant tightening of infraorbital laxity in seven patients treated with 1.5-mm (0.2 J) and 3-mm (0.45 J) focal depth transducers (with a total of 30 treatment lines).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation