2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and meta-analysis of early vs late interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous cholecystostomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systemic review and meta-analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous cholecystostomy in elderly patients was conducted by Kourounis et al 29 studies were included and there was no difference with regards to conversion rates, morbidity, and mortality between the groups. This study concluded that the timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy has no impact on the management of acute cholecystitis [37].…”
Section: Early Laparoscopic Cholecy-stectomy In Elderly Patientsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A systemic review and meta-analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous cholecystostomy in elderly patients was conducted by Kourounis et al 29 studies were included and there was no difference with regards to conversion rates, morbidity, and mortality between the groups. This study concluded that the timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy has no impact on the management of acute cholecystitis [37].…”
Section: Early Laparoscopic Cholecy-stectomy In Elderly Patientsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Previous percutaneous cholecystostomy also had a negative influence, although cholecystostomy has been widely used since the publication of the Tokyo Guidelines, numerous publications have noted its high associated morbidity, the difficulty of the laparoscopic approach, prolongation of hospital stay, and the high readmission rate. As a result, in spite of its value for managing acute episodes in fragile and high-risk patients, it should not be considered as innocuous, or as the gold standard treatment [ 38 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective study comparing 1211 patients with early cholecystectomy (0–8 weeks) versus late cholecystectomy (> 8 weeks) found that the early cholecystectomy group had a higher risk of complications and longer hospital stay [ 36 ]. In a meta-analysis published in 2022 Kourunis et al [ 37 ] compared the performance of cholecystectomy during the first 30 days and at a later date in 41 prospective and retrospective studies, without finding statistically significant differences in the clinical results. However, there was a slightly higher conversion rate in the cholecystectomy group after 30 days: 7.2% vs. 8.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%