2014
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy

Abstract: Background: Established closure techniques for the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy include stapler, suture and anastomotic closure. However, controversy remains regarding the ideal technique; therefore, the aim of this study was to compare closure techniques and risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).Methods: A systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines for studies published before January 2014 that compared at least two closure techniques for the pancreatic remnan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(93 reference statements)
5
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…36 % (Tag 30; [6]). Eine aktuelle Metaanalyse mit 37 Studien und über 5200 Patienten zeigt, dass der Staplerverschluss sowie die Anlage einer Anastomose auf die Pankreasschnittfläche eine geringere POPF-Rate aufweisen, allerdings zeigen sich auch hier die Probleme der methodologischen Heterogenität sowie der angewandten POPF-Definition, die v. a. in älteren Studien nicht einheitlich ist [28].…”
Section: Distale Pankreatektomieunclassified
“…36 % (Tag 30; [6]). Eine aktuelle Metaanalyse mit 37 Studien und über 5200 Patienten zeigt, dass der Staplerverschluss sowie die Anlage einer Anastomose auf die Pankreasschnittfläche eine geringere POPF-Rate aufweisen, allerdings zeigen sich auch hier die Probleme der methodologischen Heterogenität sowie der angewandten POPF-Definition, die v. a. in älteren Studien nicht einheitlich ist [28].…”
Section: Distale Pankreatektomieunclassified
“…But none of techniques have proven to be superior to other techniques. 11,12,13 Until 2005, the exact incidence of POPF was not known due to lack of objective definition defining POPF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morbidity rate after pancreatic surgery still remains high in the range of 15% to 65%, although mortality has decreased to less than 5% due to recent advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). In particular, pancreatic fistula is one of the most severe postoperative complications after pancreatic surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%