2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the open abdomen

Abstract: The most efficient temporary abdominal closure techniques are NPWT kits with or without a dynamic closure procedure. Evidence-based recommendations will help to tailor its use in a complex treatment pathway for the individual patient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
0
13

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
2
99
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the case described above, it is probable that conventional dressings would have been unlikely to have successfully maintained an environment conducive to healing, considering the presence of a purulent fistula in contact with the prosthetic arterial graft and the large areas of dehiscence. Systematic reviews 8,9 and a randomized study 10 show the effectiveness of negative pressure dressings in a range of situations, in terms both of the proportion of wounds healed and the speed with which they close, and they are particularly effective for diabetic feet, [11][12][13] skin grafts 14 and infections after surgery. 15,16 However, there is still a lack of good quality randomized studies free from conflicts of interest that would allow the method to be evaluated more thoroughly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the case described above, it is probable that conventional dressings would have been unlikely to have successfully maintained an environment conducive to healing, considering the presence of a purulent fistula in contact with the prosthetic arterial graft and the large areas of dehiscence. Systematic reviews 8,9 and a randomized study 10 show the effectiveness of negative pressure dressings in a range of situations, in terms both of the proportion of wounds healed and the speed with which they close, and they are particularly effective for diabetic feet, [11][12][13] skin grafts 14 and infections after surgery. 15,16 However, there is still a lack of good quality randomized studies free from conflicts of interest that would allow the method to be evaluated more thoroughly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es un método eficaz, de simple ejecución, que permite un rápido acceso a la cavidad abdominal [91][92][93][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][106][107][108][111][112][113][114] . Además, algunas prótesis pueden quedar en el lugar del implante primario e incorporarse a los tejidos favoreciendo el cierre definitivo.…”
Section: Materiales Sintéticos O Biológicosunclassified
“…Assessment of the presence of the fistula, successful closure 5 Wound closure in 7 days 6 Wound closure in 10 days 7 Wound closure in 30 days 8 Over 30 days after the end of hospitalization 4 Wound closure in 7 days 5 Wound closure in 10 days 6 Wound closure in 30 days 7 Over 30 days after the end of hospitalization 6 successful closure of the fistula (primary or resection) 7 successful diversion of the fistula content 8 unsuccessful diversion of the fistula content of the fistula, successful diversion of the fistula, and their stratification based on the indication is shown in the Table VII. Mortality rate of the patients with fistulas is shown in the Table VIII.…”
Section: Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Because of high variability and relatively small numbers of patients, assessment in terms of evidence based medicine (EBM) is rather uneasy. Pursuit of recommendations based on literary metanalysis 5 is complicated and numerous recommendations are of level B, C, and D by SIGN metodology. 6 In our previous paper, we proved statistically significant decrease of mortality by 27.64% in patient with OA, managed by NPWT vs. conventional TAC (64.71% vs. 37.04%, p = 0.0256) 7 and proved statistically significantly higher success of local management of EAF, if NPWT was used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%