2021
DOI: 10.37010/kangmas.v2i2.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Literature Review (SLR) sebagai Alternatif Penelitian pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19

Abstract: Kegiatan pelatihan SLR merupakan salah satu kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat (abdimas) yang dilakukan oleh dosen di lingkup Universitas Indraprasta PGRI. Kegiatan abdimas ini bertujuan agar peserta dapat menguasai tahapan-tahapan yang dilakukan pada SLR serta tetap produktif melakukan penelitian pada masa pandemi Covid-19. Selain itu juga dapat menemukan state of the art pada penelitian yang dilakukan.  Materi yang diberikan adalah pengenalan SLR dan tahapan melalukan review artikel secara sistematis. Hasil dari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The type of research used is the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. According to Kitchenham in Anggraeni, et al (2021), Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is "a research method for identifying, evaluating, and interpreting all relevant research results related to research questions, topics, or phenomena of concern (Ishartono et al, 2023)." The SLR method consists of the Planning stage which includes setting the subject matter according to the research object.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of research used is the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. According to Kitchenham in Anggraeni, et al (2021), Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is "a research method for identifying, evaluating, and interpreting all relevant research results related to research questions, topics, or phenomena of concern (Ishartono et al, 2023)." The SLR method consists of the Planning stage which includes setting the subject matter according to the research object.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%