2016
DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic literature review of domains assessed in psoriatic arthritis to inform the update of the psoriatic arthritis core domain set

Abstract: The objectives of this systematic literature review (SLR) were to identify domains and outcome measures used in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) studies in the past 5 years, and to compare the measurement of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 2006 PsA Core Domain Set in studies published in 2010–2015 vs those published in 2006–2010. We performed a systematic literature search in two databases, PubMed and Embase, to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in PsA. We also identified PsA longitudinal ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…10 A previous SLR reviewed the PsA outcomes used in the previous 5-year interval. 13 International focus groups Focus groups were conducted to identify domains important to patients with PsA.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 A previous SLR reviewed the PsA outcomes used in the previous 5-year interval. 13 International focus groups Focus groups were conducted to identify domains important to patients with PsA.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 9 Recent PsA RCTs assessed therapeutic efficacy not only by traditional outcomes centred on peripheral arthritis, but also additional measures of PsA manifestations (eg, systemic inflammation, enthesitis, dactylitis, structural damage, nail disease and the spine) and life impact (eg, fatigue, productivity). 10 These were considered important in the 2006 PsA core domain set but not essential to measure in all RCTs either due to insufficient data to support measurement or due to the absence of validated outcome measures. 5 11 The objective of the GRAPPA-OMERACT PsA working group was to develop consensus, at an international level, among patients and physicians on a core set of domains to be measured in PsA RCTs and LOS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, recognition of the importance of individual disease manifestations of PsA (e.g., psoriasis, nail disease, enthesitis, dactylitis) and life impact (physical function, fatigue, participation, emotional wellbeing) has led to additional outcome measures included to measure these features in PsA RCTs. [33, 34] The newest trials are incorporating a proportion of patients who have previously used or failed a TNF inhibitor by either stratifying randomization for optimal stratified analysis, or in the case of tofacitinib, devoting a full trial to these patients. [14] These patient have blunted responses compared to biologic naïve patients and thus are a “risk” in some sense for trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This PsA core domain set represented the minimum set of outcomes to be measured in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and longitudinal observational studies (LOS). A systematic literature review demonstrated increased measurement of the complete PsA core domain set from 23.5% of RCTs in 2006–2010 to 59% of RCTs in 2010–2015 3. The PsA core domain set was updated, with enhanced patient representation, in 2016 following an extensive programme of work 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%