Objective To update the 2009 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations for the spectrum of manifestations affecting patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods GRAPPA rheumatologists, dermatologists, and PsA patients drafted overarching principles for the management of PsA, based on consensus achieved at face-to-face meetings and via online surveys. We conducted literature reviews regarding treatment for the key domains of PsA (arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin disease, and nail disease) and convened a new group to identify pertinent comorbidities and their effect on treatment. Finally, we drafted treatment recommendations for each of the clinical manifestations and assessed the level of agreement for the overarching principles and treatment recommendations among GRAPPA members, using an online questionnaire. Results Six overarching principles had ≥80% agreement among both health care professionals (n = 135) and patient research partners (n = 10). We developed treatment recommendations and a schema incorporating these principles for arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin disease, nail disease, and comorbidities in the setting of PsA, using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation process. Agreement of >80% was reached for approval of the individual recommendations and the overall schema. Conclusion We present overarching principles and updated treatment recommendations for the key manifestations of PsA, including related comorbidities, based on a literature review and consensus of GRAPPA members (rheumatologists, dermatologists, other health care providers, and patient research partners). Further updates are anticipated as the therapeutic landscape in PsA evolves
ObjectiveTo identify a core set of domains (outcomes) to be measured in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) clinical trials that represent both patients' and physicians' priorities.MethodsWe conducted (1) a systematic literature review (SLR) of domains assessed in PsA; (2) international focus groups to identify domains important to people with PsA; (3) two international surveys with patients and physicians to prioritise domains; (4) an international face-to-face meeting with patients and physicians using the nominal group technique method to agree on the most important domains; and (5) presentation and votes at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) conference in May 2016. All phases were performed in collaboration with patient research partners.ResultsWe identified 39 unique domains through the SLR (24 domains) and international focus groups (34 domains). 50 patients and 75 physicians rated domain importance. During the March 2016 consensus meeting, 12 patients and 12 physicians agreed on 10 candidate domains. Then, 49 patients and 71 physicians rated these domains' importance. Five were important to >70% of both groups: musculoskeletal disease activity, skin disease activity, structural damage, pain and physical function. Fatigue and participation were important to >70% of patients. Patient global and systemic inflammation were important to >70% of physicians. The updated PsA core domain set endorsed by 90% of OMERACT 2016 participants includes musculoskeletal disease activity, skin disease activity, pain, patient global, physical function, health-related quality of life, fatigue and systemic inflammation.ConclusionsThe updated PsA core domain set incorporates patients' and physicians' priorities and evolving PsA research. Next steps include identifying outcome measures that adequately assess these domains.
The prevalence and incidence of psoriasis and PsA in Ontario are similar to those observed in Europe and the United States. The steady increase in the prevalence of psoriasis and PsA over the past decade may be due to a combination of population aging, population growth, and increasing life expectancy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Objectives
The current psoriatic arthritis (PsA) Core Domain Set defines core
domains to be measured in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and
longitudinal observational studies (LOS) and was published in 2006. At the
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) meeting in 2014, researchers,
clinicians and patients unanimously voted for updating the PsA Core Domain
Set to include the patient perspective in accordance with OMERACT Filter
2.0. Herein we report the proceedings of the PsA Workshop at the OMERACT
meeting in 2016 including studies presented in the plenary, results of
breakout group discussions, and final voting and endorsement of the 2016
updated PsA Core Domain Set.
Methods
We conducted research to develop the updated PsA Core Domain Set. At
OMERACT 2016 this work was presented, discussed in breakout groups and the
updated PsA core domain set was voted on and endorsed by OMERACT
participants.
Results
The updated PsA Core Domain Set includes: musculoskeletal disease
activity, skin disease activity, fatigue, pain, patient global, physical
function, health related quality of life and systemic inflammation which are
recommended for all RCTs and LOS). Economic cost, emotional well-being,
participation and structural damage are important but not required in all
RCTs and LOS. Independence, sleep, stiffness and treatment burden on the
research agenda.
Conclusion
The updated PsA Core Domain Set was endorsed at OMERACT 2016. Next
steps for the PsA working group include evaluation of available outcome
measures for each of the core domains and development of a PsA core outcome
measurement set.
Consensus was not reached on a continuous measure of disease activity. In the interim, the group recommended several composites. Consensus was reached on a treatment target of VLDA/MDA. An extensive research agenda was composed and recommends that data on all PsA clinical domains be collected in ongoing studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.