2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic and quantitative comparison of digest efficiency and specificity reveals the impact of trypsin quality on MS-based proteomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
279
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
279
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Advantages are that, for peptides, (1) separation by chromatography, (2) ionization, and (3) fragmentation are more efficient, (4) their masses are less heterogeneously distributed, and (5) their identification through database searches is more straightforward. Complex peptide mixtures can be either directly analyzed by liquid chromatography-MS using long gradients 22 or fractionated by hyphenation of different separation techniques beforehand 23 to reduce sample complexity and increase depth and coverage of the proteome analysis.…”
Section: Text Box 1 Liquid Chromatography-mass Spectrometry Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…21 Advantages are that, for peptides, (1) separation by chromatography, (2) ionization, and (3) fragmentation are more efficient, (4) their masses are less heterogeneously distributed, and (5) their identification through database searches is more straightforward. Complex peptide mixtures can be either directly analyzed by liquid chromatography-MS using long gradients 22 or fractionated by hyphenation of different separation techniques beforehand 23 to reduce sample complexity and increase depth and coverage of the proteome analysis.…”
Section: Text Box 1 Liquid Chromatography-mass Spectrometry Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, especially when PTM-directed antibodies are used for the analysis of ubiquitination 33 or acetylation, 34 sensitivity and consequently large sample amounts can be an issue, even requiring several milligrams per sample for a comprehensive analysis. the generated data, it is important to monitor the entire workflow including (1) patient selection, (2) blood drawing, (3) platelet isolation and purity, (4) lysis and proteolytic digestion, 21 along with analytic steps such as (5) chemical labeling, 48 (6) prefractionation of the peptide mixture, (7) LC-MS analysis, 49 and (8) MS data interpretation. At present, costs and effort to conduct LC-MS-based proteome-wide analyses from individual patients are relatively high.…”
Section: Text Box 1 Liquid Chromatography-mass Spectrometry Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One example is a study aimed at improving the understanding of the cleavage mechanism and performance of trypsin 37, 38, a crucial parameter in proteomic workflows. By inspecting the cleavage profile of all peptide identifications deposited in PRIDE, it was possible to train an algorithm that predicts trypsin cleavage sites, a functionality that is available through a web interface 39.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard workflow of MS peptide mapping includes 1) sample preparation; 2) digestion by a specific protease, such as trypsin; 3) HPLC separation of digested peptides followed by tandem MS/MS; 4) data analysis for identification and localization of the modification. 40 Over the past few years, great improvements in MS for proteomics analysis have been achieved regarding instrumentation and bioinformatics, [41][42] and some PTMs, such as phosphorylation, glycosylation, acetylation and ubiquitination can now be identified and localized in the protein sequence to a certain extent. [43][44] However, a significant amount of PTMs still remain difficult to analyze.…”
Section: Analysis Of Protein Modifications By Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%