2017
DOI: 10.15837/ijccc.2017.3.2062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System Selection and Performance Evaluation for Manufacturing Company’s ERP Adoption

Abstract: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is an important investment for manufacturing companies that can affect their competitive advantages and operational performance. However, the implementation of ERP can be a complicated process, where many strategic decisions have to be made. We focus on two critical decisions in ERP implementation: (1) ERP system selection, and (2) ERP operational performance evaluation. For the former, we use Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to design the key performance indicator (KP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the potential benefits of the information systems, many firms still face barriers to implement systems successfully. Some barriers include: complexity of the business environment, need for extensive customization, unfit for the firm's operations properties, limitations in available financial, human and technical resources, diversity of the systems, risks associated with the implementation, and absence of guidance for adoption [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Business Process Information System Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the potential benefits of the information systems, many firms still face barriers to implement systems successfully. Some barriers include: complexity of the business environment, need for extensive customization, unfit for the firm's operations properties, limitations in available financial, human and technical resources, diversity of the systems, risks associated with the implementation, and absence of guidance for adoption [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Business Process Information System Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a firm needs to select suitable information system and IT tools, adjust its business process, and evaluate performance appropriately to successfully implementing a system [30]. Since firms often do not develop their own business process information systems, the support of software developers from the installation to the implementation and everyday operation of the system is essential.…”
Section: Business Process Information System Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The issues of creation, development and implementation of decision support systems in corporate information systems, as well as business analytics were considered in the works of such researchers as: D. Appelbaum, A. Kogan, M. Vasarhelyi [1]; S. Dezdar [2]; С.-K. Hou [3]; P. Ifinedo [4]; T. Kamps, R. Stenzel, L. Chen [5]; J.-D. Leu, L. J.-H. Lee [6]; B. Niu, K. Chen, H. Huang [7]; S. Oman, R. Leskovar, B. Rosi [8]; R. Rajnoha, J. Kadarova, A. Sujova [9]; A. Uçaktürk, M. Villard [10]; M.K. Zaini, M. N. Masrek, M. D. Sani [11], D. J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do not only measure the performance of ERP systems, but also measure their contribution to the companies' strategic goals. Niu et al (2017) propose key performance indicator by utilizing analytical hierarchical process (AHP), then integrate it into fuzzy evaluation method for the assessment of ERP implementation. They consider minimization of cost, minimization of time, complete functionality, user-friendly operations, system flexibility, and system reliability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%