2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System reliability, performance and trust in adaptable automation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Team orientation and mutual trust are two teamwork factors from the Big Five model that have not been as extensively explored within the scope of this dissertation. Trust was not in focus due to the already extensive research (Muir, 1994;Bonini et al, 2001;Eurocontrol, 2003;Bekier, 2013;Chavaillaz, Wastell, & Sauer, 2016;de Visser et al, 2016) while team orientation can be seen more like an attitude rather than a behaviour compared to the other teamwork factors (Salas et al, 2005) (Paper I). Not having team orientation makes it almost impossible to establish teamwork in the first place (Salas et al, 2005).…”
Section: Two Teamwork Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Team orientation and mutual trust are two teamwork factors from the Big Five model that have not been as extensively explored within the scope of this dissertation. Trust was not in focus due to the already extensive research (Muir, 1994;Bonini et al, 2001;Eurocontrol, 2003;Bekier, 2013;Chavaillaz, Wastell, & Sauer, 2016;de Visser et al, 2016) while team orientation can be seen more like an attitude rather than a behaviour compared to the other teamwork factors (Salas et al, 2005) (Paper I). Not having team orientation makes it almost impossible to establish teamwork in the first place (Salas et al, 2005).…”
Section: Two Teamwork Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge of these boundaries provides the ability to have a safe cooperation with the automated system (Beller, Heesen and Vollrath, 2013). In the absence of such knowledge, drivers may not be able to calibrate their trust to an appropriate level (Lee and See, 2004;Chavaillaz, Wastell and Sauer, 2016). While failures of automation has been proved to have a detrimental effect on trust, Lee and See (2004) argue that some failures can be classified as "good failures" with neglegible impact on trust.…”
Section: Forms Of Trust 96mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in section 1.1, many authors have studied the effect of reliability (or automation capability) on trust (Muir, 1994;Muir and Moray, 1996;Chavaillaz, Wastell and Sauer, 2016), suggesting that with increased reliability, trust increases. However, there is no published research on the effect of static knowledge of automation capability on trust in a driving context (both "trust in the system" and "trust with the system").…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known from the theory of automated systems that the more complex the system, the greater the probability of errors and disturbances in the system (Chavaillaz 2016). The more complicated the system is, the more disturbances of a random nature, i.e.…”
Section: Systemic Errors and Possible Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%