Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

a b s t r a c tInductive charging, a form of wireless charging, uses an electromagnetic field to transfer energy between two objects. This emerging technology offers an alternative solution to users having to physically plug in their electric vehicle (EV) to charge. Whilst manufacturers claim inductive charging technology is market ready, the efficiency of transfer of electrical energy is highly reliant on the accurate alignment of the coils involved. Therefore understanding the issue of parking misalignment and driver behaviour is an important human factors question, and the focus of this paper. Two studies were conducted, one a retrospective analysis of 100 pre-parked vehicles, the second a dynamic study where 10 participants parked an EV aiming to align with a charging pad with no bay markings as guidance. Results from both studies suggest that drivers are more accurate at parking laterally than in the longitudinal direction, with a mean lateral distance from the centre of the bay being 12.12 and 9.57 cm (retrospective and dynamic studies respectively) compared to longitudinally 23.73 and 73.48 cm. With current inductive charging systems having typical tolerances of approximately ±10 cm from their centre point, this study has shown that only 5% of vehicles in both studies would be aligned sufficiently accurately to allow efficient transfer of electrical energy through induction.

No abstract

No abstract

Recently there has been a growth in the incorporation of autonomous features within vehicles. From being perceived as a comfort feature, autonomous features in vehicles have now become a safety feature which are foreseen to reduce accidents. This has led to a new trend within the automotive industry of focussing on autonomous features for driver safety, which might ultimately lead to fully autonomous vehicles. Considering the fact that most of the accidents on UK roads occur due to driver error, driver-less vehicles would prove to be a benefit. However with automation, an even greater challenge of system validation in all scenarios needs to be addressed. For this, various methods of validation have been developed by different research organizations and manufacturers, but a standardized process still evades the industry. Some of the existing methods have been discussed in this paper to critically compare their quality of results and ease of execution. Subsequently, a new test platform has been proposed using the 3xD driving simulator which encompasses most requirements of a general testing method. A standardized process which would benefit the industry both in terms of reducing costs of having varied processes, and by increasing customer confidence can be developed using a noninvasive platform like the 3xD driving simulator. The novelty of the 3xD simulator is the ability to drive-in any vehicle (production/prototype) and develop testing methodologies in an immersive wireless environment.

Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP URL' above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

No abstract