2008
DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2008.2007163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System-of-Systems Engineering Management: A Review of Modern History and a Path Forward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any CI is an instance of a system of systems (SoS) (Jamshidi, 2010;Sousa-Poza et al, 2008;Gorod et al, 2008). While regular complex IT systems still got boundaries and defined architecture, a SoS is blurrier in boundaries and may evolve in time (Giannopoulos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any CI is an instance of a system of systems (SoS) (Jamshidi, 2010;Sousa-Poza et al, 2008;Gorod et al, 2008). While regular complex IT systems still got boundaries and defined architecture, a SoS is blurrier in boundaries and may evolve in time (Giannopoulos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal complex system of systems (SOS) is a collection of collaborative systems bonded together under defined rules and regulations with the goal of exhibiting the complex properties of living systems (Boardman et al, 2006;Gorod et al, 2008;Di Mario et al, 2009). In this context, each individual, has a component structure of a "1" or "0" decision nodes which lead to action/inaction which in turn exerts its resultant influence on the overall SOS.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of system-of-systems (SoS) was first brought up in Boulding's work [1] in 1956, but it was not until 1989, with the Strategic Defense Initiative, that SoS was introduced to engineering application [2,3]. Although this field has been growing significantly in recent years [4], it is still in the primary stage without a common definition [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%