“…Both, academics and practitioners, have become conscious of this and have incorporated social responsibility as a decision criterion in their portfolio selection models. Hallerbach, Ning, Soppe, and Spronk (2004), Steuer et al (2007), Drut (2010), Ballestero, Bravo, Pérez-Gladish, Arenas-Parra, and Pla-Santamaria (2012), Dorfleitner, Leidl, and Reeder (2012), Dorfleitner and Utz (2012), Cañal (2012a, 2012b), Bilbao-Terol, ArenasParra, Cañal-Fernández, and Bilbao-Terol (2013), Cabello, Ruiz, Pérez-Gladish, and Méndez-Rodrguez (2014), Utz et al (2014) and Calvo et al (2014) acknowledge that MCDM models for portfolio selection including not only the two classical financial criteria (return and risk) but also environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues are more flexible and more likely to better represent the individual and subjective preferences of a large number of nowadays investors.…”