2012
DOI: 10.1080/17458080.2012.677549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesised magnetic nanoparticles coated zeolite (MNCZ) for the removal of arsenic (As) from aqueous solution

Abstract: A novel adsorbent, magnetic nanoparticle (-Fe 2 O 3 )-coated zeolite (MNCZ), was prepared for the removal of arsenic (As) ions from aqueous solution. The influence of different sorption parameters, that is, contact time, acidic reaction (pH) and initial arsenic concentration were studied using batch equilibrium techniques. The results obtained showed that the MNCZ was effective for the removal of As from aqueous solution, and the percentage removal of As could reach over 95.6% at a pH value of 2.5 within 15 mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase the chance of synthesized material to adsorb both kinds of chargeable pollutants (Cr -6 and Pb +2 ) especially at neutralization. This study revealed that compared to other adsorbent materials (Liu et al, 2008;Salem et al, 2014), the prepared MNPs-HA exhibited remarkable enhancement in different chargeable heavy metals. In addition to, the synthesized material (FeMNPs -HA) with adsorbed different chargeable pollutants could be easily desorbed from water with magnetic separations at very low magnetic field gradients (Liu et al, 2008), which can confidently decrease water treatment costs.…”
Section: Influence Of Pollutant Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This increase the chance of synthesized material to adsorb both kinds of chargeable pollutants (Cr -6 and Pb +2 ) especially at neutralization. This study revealed that compared to other adsorbent materials (Liu et al, 2008;Salem et al, 2014), the prepared MNPs-HA exhibited remarkable enhancement in different chargeable heavy metals. In addition to, the synthesized material (FeMNPs -HA) with adsorbed different chargeable pollutants could be easily desorbed from water with magnetic separations at very low magnetic field gradients (Liu et al, 2008), which can confidently decrease water treatment costs.…”
Section: Influence Of Pollutant Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The results of this study indicate that minimum concentration of Cd, As, Pb and Cr were observed in treatments that contain iron oxide, modified hairs, zeolite, and Mn. In the literature, many scientists have reported the efficiency of the iron oxide, modified hairs, zeolite, and Mn in reducing heavy metal toxicity [6,[52][53][54]. The treatments that contained MHs and iron oxide were statistically highly significant in reducing the available and total HMs and metalloids in plants and soil followed by the treatments that contained zeolite and KMnO 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High amounts of Cd, As, Pb, and Cr were adsorbed into the soil and reduced the available fraction of the above HMs in soil solution. KMnO 4 has been reported to reduce the availability of Cr, Pb, Cd, and As through adsorption when it is coated on the surface of different materials [65][66][67][68][69], while zeolite has the capability to adsorb Pb, Cd, As, and Cr [53,[70][71][72][73][74]. We coated KMnO 4 on the surface of zeolite so that it can increase the surface area and produce a more negative charge on the surface of the coated zeolite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,6,8,11,12]. In the past few decades, more and more nano size adsorbents and nanoparticles were exploited as highly efficient materials for arsenic adsorption [7,[12][13][14]. Nanoparticles have some benefits such as small size, catalytic potential, large surface area, high reactivity, easy separation, and large number of active sites that facilitate better arsenic removal efficiency compared to other available adsorbents [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoparticles have some benefits such as small size, catalytic potential, large surface area, high reactivity, easy separation, and large number of active sites that facilitate better arsenic removal efficiency compared to other available adsorbents . The intra‐particle diffusion of macromolecules decreases the adsorption rate and available capacity of the adsorbent, while nanoparticles have small diffusion resistance which increased the significance of the application of nanoparticles as adsorbent .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%