2019
DOI: 10.1002/ep.13147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic (III) removal from water by hydroxyapatite‐bentonite clay‐nanocrystalline cellulose

Abstract: In the present study, natural, non‐toxic nano size adsorption material: hydroxyapatite‐bentonite clay‐nanocrystalline cellulose (CHA‐BENT‐NCC) was successfully prepared for As(III) removal from water solution. The efficiency of this composite material was investigated as a function of solution pH, time, As(III) concentration, and temperature. The chemical and morphological structures of adsorbent were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive analysis of X‐rays (EDAX), transmission … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure f, we provide a comparative collection of the present BHA adsorbent versus other pertinent As­(III) adsorbents presented in the literature. It is clear in Figure f that the BHA is superior to many of the previously reported adsorbents, such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), polymer-miner composites (PMCs), , modified natural polymers (MNPs), and carbon-based materials (CBMs) for As­(III) sorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure f, we provide a comparative collection of the present BHA adsorbent versus other pertinent As­(III) adsorbents presented in the literature. It is clear in Figure f that the BHA is superior to many of the previously reported adsorbents, such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), polymer-miner composites (PMCs), , modified natural polymers (MNPs), and carbon-based materials (CBMs) for As­(III) sorption.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…269.33 R 2 0.99 second-order kinetic k 2 (g•mg −1 •h −1 ) 0.0019 0.1192 q exp (mg•g −1 ) 293 49.33 q cal (mg organic frameworks (MOFs), 43−45 polymer-miner composites (PMCs), 46,47 modified natural polymers (MNPs), 48−51 and carbon-based materials (CBMs) 52−54 for As(III) sorption. 2.3.3.…”
Section: Acs Applied Materials and Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nano-adsorbents have small size, higher surface area, easy separation, high reactivity and abundance of active sites for the removal of contaminants [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of using HA in treatment processes is its low reusability due to its low mechanical strength. Various materials such as clay, chitosan, and carbon nanotubes are added to its structure to increase its mechanical strength [8][9][10]. Clay minerals are preferred due to their low cost, nontoxicity, and high adsorption capacity [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%