2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis, structural characteristics, DNA binding properties and cytotoxicity studies of a series of Ru(III) complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were compared with the experimental photophysical and electrochemical data, antimicrobial activity and photocleavage of pBR322 DNA of complexes 1-3, also investigated cytotoxicity, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest against selected cancer cell lines by flow cytometry. All these experiments showed that the complexes 1-3 exhibit efficient activity in a dose-dependent manner [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The results were compared with the experimental photophysical and electrochemical data, antimicrobial activity and photocleavage of pBR322 DNA of complexes 1-3, also investigated cytotoxicity, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest against selected cancer cell lines by flow cytometry. All these experiments showed that the complexes 1-3 exhibit efficient activity in a dose-dependent manner [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In recent years, many research have been focused on the interaction of small molecules with DNA (Song et al 2006;Kožurková et al 2008;Tan et al 2008). DNA is generally the primary intracellular target of anticancer drugs, because the interaction between small molecules and DNA can cause DNA damage in cancer cells, blocking the division of cancer cells and resulting in cell death (Zuber et al 1998;Hecht 2000;Sastry and Patel 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The titrations were performed for complexes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) and the control ethidium bromide (0.2-1.0×10 -5 M). Each compound was introduced into the CT DNA solution and the average flow time was observed for each resulting mixture during the viscosity titration [17] . The viscosity of CT DNA increased with rising ratio of complexes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) , where η is the specific viscosity of DNA in the presence of the complex and η 0 is the specific viscosity of DNA alone; t complex , t DNA and t 0 are the average flow time for the DNA in the presence of the complex, DNA alone and Tris-HCl buffer, respectively [18] .…”
Section: Viscosity Titration Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%