2021
DOI: 10.46481/jnsps.2021.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of SnO2/CuO/SnO2 Multi-layered Structure for Photoabsorption: Compositional and Some Interfacial Structural Studies

Abstract: Many metal oxide heterostructures have been synthesized as mixed oxides or layered structures for photocatalytic, photodegradation of pollutants and light-harvesting applications. However, in the layered structures the effects of interfacial properties and composition have largely not been explored. Hence, the effects of interfacial mixing and diffusion of sandwiched thin CuO layer on optical absorption of as-deposited and heat-treated multi-layered structured SnO2/CuO/SnO2 films were studied. The RBS analysis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the comparison with existing literatures, the reported for CuO nanostructures is 1.01 eV, which is higher than that of other metal oxides 96 . Almost similar values of are observed when CuO is combined with other metal oxide systems such as in layered structures of metal oxides (e.g., SnO 2 –CuO–SnO 2 ) giving the is in the range of 1.37 to 1.92 eV 97 . Also, the for CuO nanocomposites is far reduced as compared to the pure state of CuO nanostructures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As for the comparison with existing literatures, the reported for CuO nanostructures is 1.01 eV, which is higher than that of other metal oxides 96 . Almost similar values of are observed when CuO is combined with other metal oxide systems such as in layered structures of metal oxides (e.g., SnO 2 –CuO–SnO 2 ) giving the is in the range of 1.37 to 1.92 eV 97 . Also, the for CuO nanocomposites is far reduced as compared to the pure state of CuO nanostructures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The last decade has seen the methods for environmental remediation significantly revamped by the field of nanotechnology as nanoparticles have been found to have diverse merits like large surface area, better and more active adsorption sites, high reactiveness, and small size [15,16,17]. From the perspective of oil spill remediation, nanomaterials are classified into two categories namely: organic and inorganic, which are further classified into sub-categories based on the origin and stimuli response of their precursors (Figure 3) [5].…”
Section: Common Oil Remediation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorption coefficient (α) was estimated via the Beer-Lambert relation in equations (5 and 6) using the absorbance (A) and transmittance (T) data [16,17].…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%