2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2014.05.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of cell-permeable stapled BH3 peptide-based Mcl-1 inhibitors containing simple aryl and vinylaryl cross-linkers

Abstract: We report the synthesis of a series of distance-matching aryl and vinylaryl cross-linkers for constructing stapled peptides containing cysteines at i,i+7 positions. Langevin dynamics simulation studies helped to classify these cross-linkers into two categories: the rigid cross-linkers with narrower S-S distance distribution and the flexible cross-linkers with wider S-S distance distribution. The stapled Noxa BH3 peptides with the flexible distance-matching cross-linkers gave the highest degree of helicity as w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stapled peptides targeting numerous intracellular targets have been described, with many employing an all-hydrocarbon olefin stapling moiety [5]. Alternative stapling chemistries have also been reported [6, 7]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stapled peptides targeting numerous intracellular targets have been described, with many employing an all-hydrocarbon olefin stapling moiety [5]. Alternative stapling chemistries have also been reported [6, 7]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(26) To our satisfaction, cross-linked peptide 11 showed even more potent agonist activities in dual activation of GLP-1R and GCGR with EC 50 values of 0.07 nM and 0.18 nM, respectively (Figure S2). …”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…(29) Assuming the 3 10 –helix represents an unproductive conformation, the lack of 3 10 –helix from the conformational ensemble may be beneficial to the receptor binding, although other factors other than secondary structures may also affect the binding. (26, 30) For example, despite having similar CD spectra, peptide 11 has 3–4 fold greater efficacy in receptor activation than peptide 9 (Table 1). This difference can be explained by the presence of the pyridyl nitrogen in the Bpy structure, which may form a hydrogen bond with Glu-128 of the extracellular domain of GLP-1R (Figure S4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in an α‐helical peptide, residues located at the ( i , i + 4), ( i , i + 7) or ( i , i + 11) positions reside on the same face of the helix and are therefore strategic points to place two cysteines (Figure ) . In model helical peptides, the gap between the SH group of the cysteines was estimated to span between 9‐13 Å (median 11.2 Å) when in ( i , i + 7) positions and 14‐20 Å in ( i , i +11) positions, encouraging the use of long crosslinkers of matching length. For non‐α‐helical peptides featuring cyclic loops, the number of residues between the two cysteines may be altered to create rings of differing sizes, conformations and presenting epitopes (Figure ).…”
Section: Cysteines As Targets For Peptide Staplingmentioning
confidence: 95%