Abstract:Stapled peptides are an emerging class of cyclic peptide molecules with enhanced biophysical properties such as conformational and proteolytic stability, cellular uptake and elevated binding affinity and specificity for their biological targets. Among the limited number of chemistries available for their synthesis, the cysteine-based stapling strategy has received considerable development in the last few years driven by facile access from cysteine-functionalized peptide precursors. Here we present some recent … Show more
“…Most often, however, cysteine thiol residues have provided an excellent handle for peptide stapling, driven mainly by the ease and relatively low cost of obtaining the linear pre‐stapled peptide. This topic has been recently reviewed by Fairlie . Examples of thiol cross‐linking include the use of dibromomaleimide, dichloroacetone, 1‐,4‐dichlorotetrazine, 1,2,4,5‐tetrabromodurene, α,α′‐dibromo‐ m ‐xylene, trans ‐1,4‐dibromo‐2‐butene and cis ‐1,4‐dichloro‐2‐butene and perfluoroaryl reagents .…”
Section: Dissociation Constants (Kd) For Peptides (1 7–12) Binding Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topic has been recently reviewed by Fairlie. [16] Examples of thiol cross-linking include the use of dibromomaleimide, [17] dichloroacetone, [18] 1-,4-dichlorotetrazine, [19] 1,2,4,5-tetrabromodurene, [20] a,a'-dibromo-m-xylene, [21] trans-1,4-dibromo-2butene and cis-1,4-dichloro-2-butene [22] and perfluoroaryl reagents. [23] Although significant attention has focussedo nt he natureo ft he cross-linking electrophile, comparatively little, if any,a ttention has focussed on the cysteine residues, with the single exceptiono fi ntroducing homocysteine.…”
A growing number of approaches to “staple” α‐helical peptides into a bioactive conformation using cysteine cross‐linking are emerging. Here, the replacement of l‐cysteine with “cysteine analogues” in combinations of different stereochemistry, side chain length and beta‐carbon substitution, is explored to examine the influence that the thiol‐containing residue(s) has on target protein binding affinity in a well‐explored model system, p53–MDM2/MDMX, which is constituted by the interaction of the tumour suppressor protein p53 and proteins MDM2 and MDMX, which regulate p53 activity. In some cases, replacement of one or more l‐cysteine residues afforded significant changes in the measured binding affinity and target selectivity of the peptide. Computationally constructed homology models indicate that some modifications, such as incorporating two d‐cysteine residues, favourably alter the positions of key functional amino acid side chains, which is likely to cause changes in binding affinity, in agreement with measured surface plasmon resonance data.
“…Most often, however, cysteine thiol residues have provided an excellent handle for peptide stapling, driven mainly by the ease and relatively low cost of obtaining the linear pre‐stapled peptide. This topic has been recently reviewed by Fairlie . Examples of thiol cross‐linking include the use of dibromomaleimide, dichloroacetone, 1‐,4‐dichlorotetrazine, 1,2,4,5‐tetrabromodurene, α,α′‐dibromo‐ m ‐xylene, trans ‐1,4‐dibromo‐2‐butene and cis ‐1,4‐dichloro‐2‐butene and perfluoroaryl reagents .…”
Section: Dissociation Constants (Kd) For Peptides (1 7–12) Binding Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topic has been recently reviewed by Fairlie. [16] Examples of thiol cross-linking include the use of dibromomaleimide, [17] dichloroacetone, [18] 1-,4-dichlorotetrazine, [19] 1,2,4,5-tetrabromodurene, [20] a,a'-dibromo-m-xylene, [21] trans-1,4-dibromo-2butene and cis-1,4-dichloro-2-butene [22] and perfluoroaryl reagents. [23] Although significant attention has focussedo nt he natureo ft he cross-linking electrophile, comparatively little, if any,a ttention has focussed on the cysteine residues, with the single exceptiono fi ntroducing homocysteine.…”
A growing number of approaches to “staple” α‐helical peptides into a bioactive conformation using cysteine cross‐linking are emerging. Here, the replacement of l‐cysteine with “cysteine analogues” in combinations of different stereochemistry, side chain length and beta‐carbon substitution, is explored to examine the influence that the thiol‐containing residue(s) has on target protein binding affinity in a well‐explored model system, p53–MDM2/MDMX, which is constituted by the interaction of the tumour suppressor protein p53 and proteins MDM2 and MDMX, which regulate p53 activity. In some cases, replacement of one or more l‐cysteine residues afforded significant changes in the measured binding affinity and target selectivity of the peptide. Computationally constructed homology models indicate that some modifications, such as incorporating two d‐cysteine residues, favourably alter the positions of key functional amino acid side chains, which is likely to cause changes in binding affinity, in agreement with measured surface plasmon resonance data.
“…Various stapling strategies (e.g., lactam bridges, carbon‐carbon, triazole, thioether, disulfide bonds) can be used to constrain peptides into a helical conformation but for the stapled peptides to be active against cancer cells, in addition to inhibiting MDM2:p53 and/or MDMX:p53 interactions, they must be able to cross the cell membrane and reach the cytosol where these proteins are located. Promising results have been achieved and some p53‐derived stapled peptides were shown to enter into cells and activate p53‐dependent apoptosis in vivo.…”
“…Prior to evaluating effects of thioether oxidation on molecular recognition sites in proteins, we first sought to evaluate how modulations of the structure and oxidation state of the sulfur‐bridged side chains could affect the physiochemical properties of peptides. By incorporating a bis‐thioether constraint to enforce α‐helicity in a sequence‐defined manner, helicity and polarity are evaluated (Figure A) . Oxidation of thioether groups into sulfones and sulfoxides provides a facile method for increasing polarity of otherwise hydrophobic peptides .…”
Thioethers, sulfoxides, and sulfonium ions, despite diverse physicochemical properties, all engage in noncovalent interactions with proteins. Thioether-containing macrocycles are also attracting attention as protein-protein interaction (PPI) inhibitors. Here, we used a model PPI between α-helical mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) protein and kinase-inducible domain interacting (KIX) domain to evaluate oxidation effects on sulfurcontaining macrocycle structure, stability, and protein affinity. Desolvation effects from various polarity states were evaluated computationally and experimentally at the side chain, amino acid, and peptide level. Sulfur-containing side chains spanned polarity ranges between all-hydrocarbon and lactam bridges for modulating solubility, cellular uptake, and affinity. Helical propensity studies showed that, although oxidized sulfur-containing side chains could be tolerated, conformational effects were sequence-dependent. In some cases, proteolytic stability, binding capacity with KIX, and increased helicity were obtained as first steps toward developing PPI inhibitors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.