2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of asymmetrical cellulose acetate/cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membrane: Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented study results showed that the prepared membrane from CBs had a proper morphology, and its flux and reverse salt rate were similar to the ranges reported for commercial CA membranes. Also, the removal efficiency of the prepared membrane for heavy metals was more than 85%, while the figure was more than 99% for pure CA membranes 54 , 55 . However, the efficiency of the prepared membrane can be improved by adding specific compounds to the raw material or changing the membrane production process; hence, the quality of the presented product can be considered satisfying.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presented study results showed that the prepared membrane from CBs had a proper morphology, and its flux and reverse salt rate were similar to the ranges reported for commercial CA membranes. Also, the removal efficiency of the prepared membrane for heavy metals was more than 85%, while the figure was more than 99% for pure CA membranes 54 , 55 . However, the efficiency of the prepared membrane can be improved by adding specific compounds to the raw material or changing the membrane production process; hence, the quality of the presented product can be considered satisfying.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In 2013, Butler et al reported that the efficiency of the CA membranes for chromium, lead, copper, and arsenic removal in the forward osmosis process was more than 99% 54 . In 2019, Chen et al studied the efficiency of CA membranes in lead, chromium, zinc, copper, and mercury removal at a concentration of 100 mg/L, and the mentioned removal rate for metals was more than 99% 55 . Considering that heavy metal removal using the membrane technology depends on physical, chemical, and electrochemical processes as well as hydraulic rules 56 , 57 , the metal removal efficiency achieved in this study can be explained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of formamide to membrane surfaces, as shown in Figure 4, demonstrates better pore uniformity than with PEG (Figure 3), at a range of 0.1 -0.5μm and 0.5 -1μm, respectively. These pore characteristics influence flux and rejection, as small sizes lead to higher rejection and lower flux (Chen & Lee, 2018). Desalination was conducted using sodium chloride solution as feed, at a concentration of 20,883 ppm, which was reduced to 14,118 and 10,847 ppm by membrane with PEG and formamide, respectively.…”
Section: Figure 2 Tensil Strength Of Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the increasing water demand along with the aggravation of water pollution, the clean water shortage is now considered a big issue, which has widely affected people life. 1,2 Among all the pollutions that occur in drinking water, the pollution with dye molecules is taken place as a key industrial pollution, especially in textile industry, arising from their toxicity, complex components, and so forth. 3,4 So far, numerous techniques, such as adsorption, biological treatment, and advanced oxidation, have been widely utilized for the purpose of treating dye wastewaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%