2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.02.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthesis of acicular goethite with surfactants

Abstract: Goethite nanotubes have been synthesised using polyethylene oxide surfactant as a directing agent. The surfactant enables the goethite to crystallise along a specific pathway and does not affect the crystal structure of the mineral but rather the agglomeration of the mineral. The crystals reach an optimum size at which the surfactant can bond.Introduction:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows the ATR‐FTIR absorbance spectra of electrospun PVA fibers, α‐FeOOH nanowires and PVA/α‐FeOOH composite fibers in the range of 4,000–600 cm −1 . The goethite ATR‐FTIR spectrum agrees with literature data, with a strong intensity band at 884 cm −1 and 790 cm −1 caused by δ(O–H) deformation vibrations (in plane and out of‐plane bending) and a broad band at 3,133 cm −1 due to O–H stretching vibrations . The maximum of the band at 893 cm −1 and 792 cm −1 increased with the increasing content of goethite nanowires into the PVA matrix suggesting α‐FeOOH incorporation into the mat.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Figure shows the ATR‐FTIR absorbance spectra of electrospun PVA fibers, α‐FeOOH nanowires and PVA/α‐FeOOH composite fibers in the range of 4,000–600 cm −1 . The goethite ATR‐FTIR spectrum agrees with literature data, with a strong intensity band at 884 cm −1 and 790 cm −1 caused by δ(O–H) deformation vibrations (in plane and out of‐plane bending) and a broad band at 3,133 cm −1 due to O–H stretching vibrations . The maximum of the band at 893 cm −1 and 792 cm −1 increased with the increasing content of goethite nanowires into the PVA matrix suggesting α‐FeOOH incorporation into the mat.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Mesoporous catalysts have large active surface area, good mechanical hardness, and very good hydrodynamic parameters for the contact with liquid phase [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Commonly mesoporous catalysts based on silica and even metal oxides are formed exploiting self-assembly of large organic surfactant or block copolymer molecules [4][5][6][7][8][9]. For metal oxide-based mesoporous solids an alternative to this approach are provided by self-assembly mechanisms guiding the aggregation of the primary oxometallate particles, MTSALs [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixing of the nanorods and the lamellar phase presumably leads to an energy gain owing to the formation of hydrogen bonds between the hydrated surface of the particles and the surfactant heads. 26 At this point, we have no convincing explanation for the threshold value of the repeat distance. The most plausible connection is that, as the lamellar phase becomes more concentrated, its elastic moduli increase and so does the interaction between particles, 3 to the point of inducing aggregation.…”
Section: Phase Diagram Of the Doped Systemmentioning
confidence: 86%